That doesn’t cut it; a purely semantic argument from an academic stance is cowardly and impotent. All “gods” and their related cults are an intrinsic obstacle to human development as a species. Don’t even get me started on the systemic exploitation of the mentally/emotionally vulnerable, or unchecked sexual predation on children. Fuck your religion, every religion. Full stop.
So you consider that to be an ‘elucidated statement’ about ignosticism:
Ignosticism or igtheism is the idea that the question of the existence of God is meaningless because the word “God” has no coherency and an ambiguous definition.
You ok, kiddo?
Tell you what if you’re not going to read can you do another ignorant rant for me?
I love how you describe their well elucidated statement as ignorant when the exact opposite is true.
So you consider that to be an ‘elucidated statement’ about ignosticism:
lol- you’re even funnier than the first guy!