While several religious groups urged SCOTUS to have compassion, Gospel Rescue Mission took the path of cruelty
  • LostWon@lemmy.caEnglish
    96·
    7 months ago

    GRM is a Christian ministry that requires all residents to work for them without pay for “six hours a day, six days a week in exchange for a bunk for 30 days.” They also cannot look for outside work during that month. That’s not all though. They must also attend church every Sunday (from a pre-approved list); Unitarian services are not acceptable. And they have to attend a chapel service twice a day. And they can’t smoke or drink. And they can’t have sex during their stay

    So it’s a cult. Why are cults allowed to pull crap like this? This kind of thing should be prosecuted.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
      112·
      7 months ago

      they totally had sex. probably in the chapel. probably during the services. Definitely outside of services.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      7 months ago

      Why are cults allowed to pull crap like this?

      Because it serves the interests of partisan leadership within the state. Loyal foot soldiers desperate enough to bend the knee for this shitty deal are an invaluable human resource that private industry and fascist activism seeks to cultivate.

  • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.caEnglish
    101·
    7 months ago

    Christians want to go to “hell” sooo fucking bad bro, lmao like why would anyone ask for this and also expect to go to their “good place”??

    • derpgon@programming.devEnglish
      4·
      7 months ago

      Fun fact, Good Place (TV Series, highly recommend to watch)

      Good Place spoiler

      ends up being the “bad place” (as in Hell)

        • derpgon@programming.devEnglish
          2·
          7 months ago

          It is, for me, still the best ending of any TV shoe I have watched. So well executed I couldn’t believe it.

  • tearsintherain@leminal.spaceEnglish
    8·
    7 months ago

    To be clear it was a specific ministry, the Gospel Rescue Mission, who seem to be militant-crusader-forced-conversion-fundamentalist types.

    It’s telling that there’s literally zero mention of “God” anywhere in the brief—which is rather unusual for a Christian group making an argument to the Supreme Court. Especially this Supreme Court. The argument isn’t a religious one because how could it be? The ministry says they have beds available, but for various reasons, many of them are going unused. They must know how bad it would look to justify the cruelty against the homeless using the language of faith. Yet they seem blissfully unaware of how their own religious restrictions may play a significant role in why people with no other options still don’t want to ask them for help.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      7 months ago

      There weren’t a lot of other options and it sounded better for recruitment than “Selfish Assholes”, understandable really.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.worldEnglish
      81·
      7 months ago

      Don’t do that. They’re Christians because they said so, there is no standard or membership card. To act like the bad ones aren’t “real Christians” is a cop out and ignores the problems within your religion. Own it, fix it, re-educate your fellow believers, don’t act like they’re not real and sweep them under the rug.

      • Mango@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        7 months ago

        You may have gotten the impression that I’m claiming their religion. I do not. I just figure they all specifically worship a guy who was definitely homeless and born in a barn.