Kurt Eisner, born on this day in 1867, was a German socialist revolutionary and radical journalist who was assassinated by a far-right nationalist while serving as head of the People’s State of Bavaria.
Kurt Eisner, born to a Jewish family in Berlin, was a revolutionary German socialist, radical journalist, and theater critic. Before leading the People’s State of Bavaria, he worked as a journalist in Marburg, Nuremberg, and Munich. In the early 1890s, Eisner served nine months in prison for writing an article that attacked Kaiser Wilhelm II.
In 1918, Eisner was convicted of treason for his role in inciting a strike of munitions workers. He spent nine months in Cell 70 of Stadelheim Prison, but was released during the General Amnesty in October of that year.
Following his release from prison, Eisner helped organize the revolution that overthrew the Bavarian monarchy, declaring Bavaria to be a free state and republic. Despite Eisner’s socialist politics, he explicitly distanced the movement from the Bolsheviks and promised to uphold property rights.
On February 21st, 1919, while on his way to deliver his resignation to Parliament, Eisner was assassinated in Munich by a far-right German nationalist. Eisner’s murder made him a martyr for left-wing causes, and a period of lawlessness in Bavaria followed his death.
On the night of April 6th-7th, 1919, communists, encouraged by the news of the communist revolution in Hungary, declared a Soviet Republic, with Ernst Toller as chief of state. The Bavarian Soviet Republic was crushed by the right-wing German Freikorps.
Some of the military leaders of the Freikorps, including Rudolf Hess and Franz Ritter von Epp, would go on to become powerful figures in the Nazi Party. Ironically, Adolf Hitler himself marched in the funeral procession for Eisner, a Jew, wearing a red armband as a display of sympathy.
“Truth is the greatest of all national possessions. A state, a people, a system which suppresses the truth or fears to publish it, deserves to collapse.”
- Kurt Eisner
https://spartacus-educational.com/GEReisner.htm
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
One simple question to sort the reddit atheist wheat from the chaff: which is more harmful, Christianity or Islam?
The correct answer is obviously kkkristianity.
Trick question. The notion of a secular social or political sphere is inherently modern, and even in the modern day many secular societies are still enmeshed in secular religions that reproduce many of the harms of theistic religions. Once we’ve successfully killed god we’re gonna have to hunt down George Washington and Europa and beat them to death.
Also, all the bad things happened in religious societies, but all the good things happened in religous societies too and trying to separate those things is ashistorical nonesense. It’s also anti-materialist. Religion is oppressive because it is part of societies with oppressive economic systems. Feudalism without Christianity or Islam or Hindu or whatever is still feudalism. The ruling powers would have come up with some other thought system to justify their power and oppression if no one had ever thought up gods. You can’t address the oppressions of religion without addressing class, race, gender, and other oppresions as part of the same political program. This is readily apparent in history if one just looks at all the proto-socialist movements that arose in a religious context, were justified by religious beliefs, and very often promoted radical class, gender, racial, and other equalities before they were crushed by the ruling powers. Religion isn’t oppressive in and of itself, but it is a component of the vast machine of oppression which comprises our capitalist world.
That’s all true. But it’s intended to be a trick question. It quickly sorts out the islamophobic New Atheism types from the ones who you can even have that level of discussion with.
Extremely true.