A federal judge in Fort Worth, Texas, on Friday blocked a new Biden administration rule that would prohibit credit card companies from charging customers late fees higher than $8.

US District Judge Mark T. Pittman, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, granted a preliminary injunction to several business and banking organizations that allege the new rule violates several federal statutes.

These organizations, led by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, sued the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after the rule was finalized in March. The rule, which was set to go into effect Tuesday, would save consumers about $10 billion per year by cutting fees from an average of $32, the CFPB estimated.

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      149
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Infuriating thing was, this judge was clearly shopped for, but he kicked the case to the DC district Court instead of Texas. He himself even accused the banks of venue shopping in the ruling when he did so! Unfortunately the DC district court sent it right back and said he still had to take the case. He should have recused himself at that pont anyways given his stock holdings and things, but he now decides to reward the the banks for their venue shopping he’s clearly aware of. Judiciary is rotten.

      https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-judge-moves-fee-case-232103686.html

      • breetai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 month ago

        He just put an injunction in place which is common. It just means the case has to be decided first.

        If he’s accusing them of venue shopping. I suspect he’s going to rule against them.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 month ago

          The legal standard for an injunction also includes a “likelihood of success on the merits.” The judge agrees with the banks in his ruling that they are likely to succeed on the case. So unfortunately the injunction is a signal there is a good chance he rules in the banks favor ultimately. Though he spends a bunch of the ruling just talking about how he’s mad this case was kicked back to him. He only spends like a page talking about if the legal standard for injunction has been met or not.

          https://www.consumerfinancemonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2024/05/US_DIS_TXND_4_24cv213_d230938971e185_OPINION_ORDER_Before_the_Court_is_Plaintiffs_Motio.pdf

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not just likelihood of success, but also whether any irreparable harm could occur while the case is being decided, in the event the case favors the plaintiffs. In this case, if card companies are only allowed to collect $8 while the case is ongoing, and then a judge ruling they are allowed to collect more than that, means there’s a monetary loss that will have happened. Now I wouldn’t be crying if credit card companies are forced to stop ripping people off, and absolutely fuck the Chamber of Commerce, but that’s what it is.

            • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Yes I agree, but it doesn’t just have to meet some of those criteria to get an injunction, it has to meet all those criteria, including likelihood of success. They can’t just argue irreparable harm only if the judge thinks they’re unlikely to succeed. The judge seems to agree with them in that section of the ruling that he thinks that the rule is likely unconstitutional. And conservative judges have been pretty hostile to the consumer financial protection bureau in general. I’m not holding my breath, at least not for this judge, but maybe ultimately on appeal the cfpb will still succeed in the end.

            • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              What about the irreparable harm caused by outlandish fees, or will they be forced to pay those back?

              • Billiam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Since credit card companies are currently allowed to charge outrageous fees, that would be akin to an ex post facto action so no they wouldn’t. Also while said fees are outrageous, the harm to consumers isn’t relevant because the suit is between credit card companies and the government.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      ““Gotta love how it’s always one asshole judge trump appointee in Texas that can stop legislation for the whole country.””

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    253
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    I want stories like this bombarded at the morons on here saying Biden does nothing and both sides are the same.

    This Trump fucker is actively fighting for mega corps.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I want stories like this bombarded at the morons on here saying Biden does nothing

      Biden putting up rules and then failing to enforce them because of a predictable Texas appeallate court issuing a predictable injunction amounts to nothing.

      Biden had the opportunity to pack the courts back in 2021 and… didn’t. He still has the opportunity, right now, while he has a Senate majority.

      This isn’t just a Biden problem. I could name a dozen of Senate Dems who paved the way for a stacked court, going back to the McCain-friendly Democrats caving to Frist’s Nuclear Option back in 2005 (senior senator from Delaware whatsisface notwithstanding).

      But this is a kind of learned liberal helplessness, when a guy like Biden can throw you an empty headline and get “See! He tried to do something! We just need to give him 2009 supermajorities before they’ll work!” Meanwhile, if any Republican wins any branch of any level of government, that’s all they need to eviscerate democracy forever.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m more willing to give Biden credit when he’s blocked by trump appointed judges than I am when he’s blocked in the senate by members of the party he nominally heads.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The Legislative Branch does not report to the Executive Branch, it checks it. If the Senate reported to the President, they wouldn’t be doing their job. Trump’s presidency was a good example of corruption of governmental checks and balances.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The Legislative Branch does not report to the Executive Branch, it checks it.

          Do they ever. And you may support legislators based solely on how reliably they kill progressive policy for you, but I don’t.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Progressivism is not a contest. Party division weakens us. Just look at how it’s affected the Republican Party.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I’m not happy with centrism. The term is progressive for a reason. If you abandon all progress short of the goal, you’re not progressing. That just leads to party division, disenfranchisement, and Republican regression. Liberal policies of today were the progressive legislation of the past.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  19
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’m not happy with centrism. The term is progressive for a reason. If you abandon all progress short of the goal, you’re not progressing. That just leads to party division, disenfranchisement, and Republican regression.

                  Stop trying to redefine “progressive” to mean “slow walking progress.”

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      We don’t yet know if he actually did anything here or not, we will find out when the legal challenges are done. On one hand, it may survive, in which case something was actually accomplished, on the other hand, Biden may have wasted a whole bunch of people’s time and clogged up the courts even more than they already are.

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        WTF kind of logic is this? Are you saying he shouldn’t even try and just sit with his thumbs up his ass rather than try to accomplish good things because a court may block it? Should we all just throw our hands up and give up doing anything at all?

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s a terrible argument. And love how you blame the obstructionism on the one being obstructed from accomplishing their goals.

        So, no, we have already seen the action. He did something. Will the sociopathic fascist a-holes in government overturn the action ALREADY TAKEN is what remains to be seen.

        • Reyali@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          First off, I totally agree the argument you responded to is bad and that Biden is driving toward the right goal.

          However, if we disambiguate the specific circumstance here, there is sometimes an argument to be made that the one being obstructed is the problem. Think about how many obviously illegal laws Republicans have pushed through. A recent example would be DeSantis’ “Stop WOKE” act trying to eliminate DEI training in companies. It so clearly goes against federal law about protected classes and was deemed unconstitutional because of the first amendment. I don’t think there’s any chance DeSantis actually believed this act was legal or would be allowed, he just wanted the brownie points of “hurr durr, own the libs.”

          There are so many cases of that kind of thing, and I think it’s absolutely fair to be critical of those whose laws are being obstructed when they initiate them in bad faith.

          However, like I said, that doesn’t apply in this situation; this law was not made in bad faith, and the Texas court is definitely the problem here. I only bring it up because “blaming the obstructionism on the one being obstructed” can sometimes be a legit argument.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    See, Biden is doing things. Don’t eat the Russian misinformation troll’s onion.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also a good example of how executive orders are not the end-all-be-all solution for problems that could in theory be solved by the executive alone. We shouldn’t be blaming Biden for not doing things that ultimately are the responsibility of legislative inaction.

      It’s still bullshit that this was blocked, and definitely raises suspicion that the judge in question is bought and paid for by the banking industry, or at the very least, a Trump appointee who doesn’t think twice about looking the other way if it helps Don the Con.

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I just looked up how US citizens can fight judicial corruption and apparently corrupt judges can be reported to the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Transparency International or the Judicial Integrity Network.
          Maybe we should start reporting every judge that pulls crap like this to these agencies. Maybe something will actually change if/when investigations start happening.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Generally Obstructive Party will block this and then specifically bring up he didn’t do shit about it. Their base won’t even check that he tried and will say he tried because he knew it would fail, and they don’t want lower credit card fees anyway.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          good things the left-wing is trying to pass that the right-wing is stopping

          When you can pass bills that can TikTok from the minority by stapling them to foreign military aid, but you can’t expand Medicare or sanction polluters or secure women’s rights to health care or enfranchise DC voters…

          This isn’t “the right just sabotaged us!” it’s “the moderates just sided with reactionaries again”.

          Caps on credit card fees? Left proposed, right killed.

          So much of this boils down to Dems green lighting GOP judicial nominees while Repubs block Dem nominees without consequences.

          What is the remedy for this obstruction other than to scream “Vote or things will get worse!” every two years?

          The Dens won’t pack the court. They won’t use our majorities when we have them. They won’t stop giving their economic rivals tons of free money. They won’t stop sending cops into university campuses to crack heads.

          Throwing up a rule so a Trump judge can skeet shoot it isn’t “doing anything” when you already know the outcome.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              The cops crack heads under any president.

              One of the significant benefits of the FDR presidency was his refusal to unleash police on labor leaders.

              That ended under Truman and J. Edgar Hoover.

              You’re rambling.

              I’m sorry if a bit of history startled you.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Biden hasn’t unleashed the cops on labor leaders.

                  The FBI cointelpro program has gone uninterrupted since it’s inception.

                  I understand it’s hard for a тролль to understand

                  Doing whataboutism to own the Ruskies

  • prole@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    US District Judge Mark T. Pittman, an appointee of former President Donald Trump

    This is where we share reaping what we sowed with the long term secondary and tertiary damage from electing Donald Trump (and by extension, giving the Federalist Society carte blanche to re-form the judiciary in their hateful, spiteful image). They will continue to happen for decades to come (and will often be blamed on the liberals/progressive currently in power because they’ll be the only ones trying to do anything to fix it).

    The future’s looking bright, guys

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, better than nothing, but wouldn’t have been enough.

      Another example why it never pays off to go after moderate solutions. Republicans will fight everything equally as hard, so why not actually try for a lot?

      At least then when things actually make it, they cause a difference

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The things that actually make it trend to be the things that can get enough centrist support to overcome Republicans. Or on the rare occasion when Democrats can cut Republicans out of the process entirely (ie budget reconciliation)

    • Brosplosion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Without late fees there is no incentive to pay on time. I don’t understand the rationale to remove them entirely, though regulating maximums makes sense.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good ol’ Christian Right wanting a Christian Nation while defending banks and ignoring their Jesus who destroyed the money lenders’ tables.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      It shocks me that people are still shocked that American Christians dont read the bible or have any idea whats in it.

      Especially when they, as a group, spend damn near every waking moment violating mathrew 6:5-6:8

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The problem is you can interpret it however you want. It’s very easy to justify defying almost any of Christ’s teachings with some fun wordplay. Matthew 6:5-8 is about performative worship, and Christians don’t do performative worship you see, they are actually worshiping so it doesn’t count. Not sure how they weasel themselves out of Matthew 6:14-15 though

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        They read the parts they want. They hear what they’re told to believe by their preachers. In the end it doesn’t matter, they just interpret it how they want and disregard the rest.

    • Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The one time Jesus got angry. Go figure…

      Edit: on record. I guess he could’ve had some pretty terrible 2s, or something, that we don’t know about.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “Whoa hold on, think about the poor oligopoly” -some republican judge, probably

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    The next president needs to pack the Federal court benches. I am getting so tired of right wingnuts upending democracy with these BS rulings.

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This kind of stuff is absolutely the number one failure of Democrats. They want to play fair and by the rules, so when there’s opposition to their appointments they just lie down and accept it until the Republicans get exactly who they want. Meanwhile the Republicans will lie, cheat, and slander their way to anything they want, including getting ultra-conservatives in on positions that aren’t supposed to be political.

      Biden’s been way better in this regard which is part of what makes him way better than previous Democrat presidents. But I still don’t have high hopes for “the party of compromise” in getting progressives in these kinds of positions. In particular, we all remember what happened at the end of Obama’s presidency with supreme court judges and Roe v Wade.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Democrats use “fair and by the rules” as an excuse for failing at playing politics. It was clear what was going to happen. Nobody did anything except the Republicans who capitalized everything everywhere for a decade. Democrats and liberals are still unaware what happened

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You guys are missing an essential point — conservatives control the narrative.

          • From Fox News blowing MSNBC and CNN out of the water in ratings
          • Right-wing talk radio pioneered by Rush Limbaugh
          • Indoctrination Centers (churches) across America…

          Conservatives LONG won the information war.

          What does this mean? Republicans can do no wrong while Democrats are held to an infinitely higher standard and anything they do is hammered home to the ignorant, uneducated average American FAR greater than what Democrats can do to the right.

          Things have marginally improved in the last 10 years as the recognition of Botherism has expanded, but let’s not forget: (1) Republicans still have the majority of the money, (2) Republicans won huge with Citizens United and SpeechNow decisions, and (3) they’re assholes and assholes will beat you with experience.

          Catering to a broader coalition on the left that is also far less confrontational by the nature of being more empathetic is also something that we as a group must come to terms with. Our rallying points have never been blind loyalty and fear-mongering like the Right uses with the literally biochemically-altered conservative brain (studies on MRI testing prove this). We gather strength through vision, hope, solidarity, love — hence why Obama’s Hope & Change message in 2008 was pure genius.

          Though I will say I do agree there is a certain type of character we can seek to promote on the left, like AOC, like Bernie, like Warren, and like even Swalwell. Someone not afraid to push the bully back. Hopefully we learned a big lesson from Obama’s era of capitulation and seeing his hand get smacked down over and over as he tried to reach across the aisle.

      • MrEff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        My personal saying has always been: Democrats rule with incompetence. Republicans rule with spite and malice.

  • MrMeanJavaBean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    But both sides! They’re the same! Blah blah blah. Politicians are politicians, but the Republicans do absolutely nothing to actually better the lives of their voters. Republicans answer only to the pursuit of absolute power and their wealthy donors. End rant…

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any websites that keep score on judges? We may not get to vote on federal judges, but some of us get to on others.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    OK… so this is weird. The Supreme court just upheld that the funding structure of the CFPB was constitutional overruling the 5th circuit ruling that the CFPB funding structure was unconstitutional… But THIS federal judge just used the 5th court unconstitutionality ruling as the basis for why this CFPB credit card rule was unconstitutional (the CFPB is unconstitutional so any decision they make is invalid). It seems like he’s leaning on a just overturned ruling to make this decision. Is this just a case of a timing error where everything in the credit card fee case was filed before he Supreme Court overruled the 5th circuit’s ruling or is there another argument there?

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      US Chamber of Commerce is a Conservative lobby group with a name meant to sound innocuous. Local CoCs run the gamut but are generally for small to mid businesses to network and collectively engage when the local government. Kinda like a union but for bosses.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s just a made up private company like the better business bureau. The try to seem official or related to government but it’s just another company.