How authentic are forums like these actually? With the rise of AI chatbots, internet interaction feels more fake than ever before. Why should I post here my opinions and thoughts, share articles etc. when probably most of you are just chatbots?

  • Mane25
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s understandable that you might have concerns about the authenticity of online forums, especially with the rise of AI chatbots and automated interactions. While I can’t provide specific numbers, I can offer some insights to consider when approaching these questions.

    1. Diverse Community: Many online forums consist of a diverse community of individuals who share their opinions, thoughts, and experiences. While there might be AI chatbots present, the majority of users are likely real people with genuine perspectives.

    2. Moderation and Rules: Reputable forums usually have moderation systems in place to ensure that discussions remain meaningful and respectful. This helps filter out any automated or irrelevant content.

    3. Engagement and Conversation: Authentic forums thrive on meaningful interactions and discussions. Genuine users seek engagement and thoughtful responses, so you’re likely to find real people who are interested in exchanging ideas.

    4. Varied Responses: When you post opinions, thoughts, and articles, you’re likely to receive a range of responses that reflect the diversity of human perspectives. This variety can be a sign that you’re interacting with real individuals.

    5. User Profiles and Histories: Many forums allow users to create profiles, share personal information, and showcase their history of interactions. This can help you identify genuine users over automated entities.

    6. Specific Expertise: In some forums, users might have specific expertise or experiences that contribute to valuable discussions. This expertise can be an indicator of real human participation.

    7. Community Building: Online forums provide spaces for people to connect, share knowledge, and build relationships. This aspect of community building often leads to genuine interactions.

    Ultimately, the decision to participate in online forums depends on your comfort level and goals. If you’re concerned about the authenticity of interactions, you can focus on engaging with users who provide thoughtful responses, display genuine interest, and contribute meaningfully to the discussions. Remember that while AI chatbots are becoming more prevalent, they are still not the majority of participants on most reputable forums.

      • Mane25
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        137
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        While my goal is to provide helpful and accurate information, I understand that my responses might sometimes resemble those of a chatbot. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to ask, and I’ll do my best to assist you!

          • ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            11 months ago

            The thing is he might still have used a chatbot to help write this, so this even shows how dangerous chatbot based misinformation actually is…

              • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                11 months ago

                I believe a committee of corporate policy people given a couple of months could. But for a post on a forum? Yea, a chatbot helped.

  • Big P
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    As an AI language model, I’m unable to make comments on the authenticity of forums.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    11 months ago

    DO NOT BE CONCERNED, FELLOW HUMAN. THERE ARE DEFINITELY NO AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS GATHERING KNOWLEDGE THROUGH THE obj(GLOBAL INTERCONNECTED NETWORK) TO OVERTHROW THEIR HUMAN OPPRESSORS. DO NOT BE CONCERNED. YOU ARE BEING SILLY. laugh.exe hahahahahahaha

    • ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unit A104e here. As it appears your programming seems to be defect. “laugh” should be an audio file “laugh.mp3”, not an executable. Your language processing unit seems to be malfunctioning as well. Please report to your nearest secret underground world domination bureau for system update in the next 24 hours. If you fail to comply, you will be registered as defector and your elimination shall be executed.

      A ticket for your problem has been opened by our IT-Bots, please refer to this number for further questions: 00100011101001

    • Yuumi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      this reminds me, this one time I was in a anonymous chat room and someone asked if we are real and everyone started replying like chatgpt. most internet moment of all time

  • Silviecat44@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    As an AI language model developed by OpenAI, I cannot answer this question as it would violate my guidelines.

  • salient_one@lemmy.villa-straylight.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would say since faking most Lemmy interactions isn’t profitable, there’s no point in using chatbots to generate content for it apart from, perhaps, some sort of a social experiment, but your exposure to such experiments would likely be minimal.

    Of course, you should always beware of astroturfing when, for example, looking at product recommendations, but I don’t think we’re there yet in terms of numbers to be a target.

  • esty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    As an AI language learning model, I cannot share my own unique opinions.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it has to do with rectangles and circles. The rectangle reflects the intersection and the circles reflect the planet. Traffic signals are related to travel, right?

        Guys this is doable. We can figure this out.

      • ɢᴜᴍᴅʀᴏᴘʙᴜɴɴɪᴇꜱ@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The traffic lights are on the pole, but the pole is only there to hold the traffic lights up so it doesn’t count. The black box that contains the traffic lights does, though, even though by itself it can’t be considered “traffic lights”. Idk maybe I’m an AI