There’s an old saying in London – you’re never more than 6ft from a rat and 50m from a Pret a Manger. But the popular high street sandwich chain has struggled in recent years with consumers abandoning ship. With a rising tide of debts, it has now recalled its initial founder, Sinclair Beecham, to the top table in order to steady the ship.

One of its main competitors, Greggs, however has been doing better than ever. So why the huge disparity in the fortunes of these two high street staples? Strong brand partnerships with outlets like Primark, a late-opening store in Leicester Square, and a keenly recognisable brand identity have ensured its continuous rise.

The contrasts between the two are clear. If both continue down this path, the Northern delight that is Greggs will likely cement itself at the top of the food chain while Pret’s struggles will only worsen.

  • david
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, Pret a Manger has a reputation for being expensive and pretentious, whereas Greggs has a reputation for being cheap and unpretentious.

    • Digestive_Biscuit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Greg’s also have placed on industrial estates, motor ways, town centres, etc. They’ve made it so anybody can easily access them. I can’t even think of any prets near where I live. Probably is but perhaps it blend into the background.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I live in zone 5 in London. There are zero Prets here, as this area is not fancy enough. But we have two Greggs.