You must log in or register to comment.
Unite, Labour’s biggest trade union backer, has refused to endorse the party’s general election manifesto, saying it does not go far enough on protecting workers’ rights and jobs in the oil and gas industry.
I thought we were going Green these days? Not supporting fossil fuel industries.
The oil and gas industry isn’t short of money. If its workers aren’t getting a share of that dirty money, I’m not sure it’s entirely the government at fault
Except of course, nobody mentioned money.
Unite’s position on this is that oil and gas shouldn’t be phased out until there are suitable replacement jobs in the green sector.
What the fuck?
So do we need to make up jobs for them, or are they bitching that because the Green sector is smaller, they can’t support it?
This makes me want to vote for them even harder.
Vote me harder. Vote me harder! Yes! Vote me! Uuuugggghhhh 🫠
This might not be a bad thing. The crazies who usually vote conservative and drink up anti union rhetoric might be more tempted to lean towards Labour
So much so it would not surprise if this was agreed between the two of them.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Unite, Labour’s biggest trade union backer, has refused to endorse the party’s general election manifesto, saying it does not go far enough on protecting workers’ rights and jobs in the oil and gas industry.Union leaders were at a meeting on Friday to finalise the party’s 2024 election platform ahead of its launch next week.The BBC understands that at the meeting Unite announced they would not endorse Labour’s plans.There is now a question mark over whether Unite will fund the party at the general election.
In 2019, Unite gave £3m to Labour’s campaign.
Live: Follow the latest news about the UK general electionPoll tracker: How do parties compareVoting: When is the election and how do I voteNetwork of X users smears politicians with deepfake clipsGeneral election 2024: All BBC stories and analysis
Unite General Secretary Sharon Graham had previously warned there were “no blank cheques” for Labour.Ahead of the meeting, Unite told the BBC it wanted to see the end of zero hours contracts - and a complete ban on the practice of “hire and fire” practices where workers are fired and taken back on with worse pay and conditions.
“We go into the meeting with open hearts but girded loins,” one union leader told the BBC before entering the meeting.The public service union Unison wanted to ensure commitments to improved pay and wage bargaining are in the document.When asked about union unease before the meeting, Sir Keir said: “We’ve got a very good package for working people.
"Labour’s main themes for government have been established for months, but final details will be published next week in a full manifesto launch.A manifesto outlines what a party plans to do if it forms the next government.But party rules, specifically clause five, require the final manifesto to be signed off at a special meeting of the shadow cabinet, the parliamentary committee of Labour MPs, the Scottish and Welsh Labour leaders, the chair and vice-chairs of the National Policy Forum, the national executive committee, and representatives of affiliated trade unions.Clause five does not require all stakeholders to agree to the manifesto for it to be valid.The BBC understands there was no formal vote, and party sources say the document was approved by a round of applause.Ahead of the meeting, Sir Keir confirmed to the BBC that Labour’s manifesto will include a commitment to recognise a Palestinian state as “part of the process” to a two-state solution.The Labour leader said it is important there is a “viable Palestinian state alongside a safe and secure Israel”.Labour sources have said the document will be “radical” on planning reforms and housebuilding.It also includes plans to recruit more teachers and police officers and to cut net migration.After snap elections in 2017 and 2019, this year’s manifesto is the first time in a decade the Labour party enters an election having completed its complex policy sign-off process.While many party figures have been involved in shaping parts of the manifesto, the whole document is being closely guarded to reduce the chance of leaks.
The original article contains 541 words, the summary contains 502 words. Saved 7%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
No point. Starmer is a dictator.
Starmer is a dictator.
He’s not Corbyn, so he’s literally Hitler.
I don’t remember Corbyn kicking people out of the party at will and foisting his loyalists into seats without consulting the Labour constituencies
“Starmer Purge of Labour Left Risks Undermining UK Campaign”
Is a Bloomberg headline.
Bloomberg.
I’m not sure that qualifies him as a dictator
How dare he focus on getting elected and allowing the national committee to investigate people for things like saying comments which could be classed as anti-Semitic or for behaving poorly towards staff members in the past?
Who are you referencing in this comment? Because the people that come to mind for me are Faiza Shaheen, who was deselected for, from what I can tell, liking some tweets that were critical of Israel, and Luke Akehurst, who has been selected while actually being antisemetic (but pro Israel so it’s fine I guess)
I was referencing (a) Shaheen who liked a tweet saying "Every time you say something even mildly critical of Israel, you’re immediately assailed by scores of hysterical people who explain to you why you’re completely wrong, how you’re biased against Israel.
“Moreover, you can’t easily ignore them because those are not just random people. They tend to be friends or people who move in the same circles as you.
Those people are mobilised by professional organisations." . Now whether or not I agree with her viewpoint it would so clearly be twisted by the right wing media to hurl claims of antisemitism at the labour party again. When we as a party have worked so hard to get away from that smear you have to be more careful than that.
And (b) Lloyd Russell-Moyle who has had a behavioural complaint made against him. Again, it does look to be timed in such a way as to punish Russell-Moyle whatever conclusion the NEC come to as his seat will have already gone to another MP, but equally, do we want a party that don’t investigate such things, or try to sweep them under the carpet? BBC News - www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5114q1x09eo
I hadn’t heard of Akehurst before your comment, and have to say I’m very disappointed that he’s been selected, given both of the rows I’ve referenced I don’t think he should have been. Thank you for bringing him to my attention.
