• XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a fucking defective product. It shouldn’t be legal to sell.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Unfortunately, all-in-one printers arbitrarily demanding ink to perform non-printing functions isn’t a new frustration.

    Clearly, scanning or faxing without requiring an ink cartridge would improve users’ experience—and they’ve illustrated that through class-action lawsuits.

    Tying the scan or fax capabilities of the All-In-One Printers to ink contained in the devices offers no benefit and only serves to disadvantage and harm consumers financially.

    However, tying the scan or fax capabilities of the All-In-One Printers to ink contained in the devices does, however [sic], serve to benefit HP.

    HP in 2021, for example, said its Instant Ink subscription business was worth $500 million, per CRN.

    In its Q2 2023 financial report, HP named Instant Ink a key growth area.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • requiem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    With so much open source hardware out there, how come there isn’t an open source printer yet?