• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wonder if the people who wrote the law know that there are multiple versions of the 10 commandments.

    They’re pretty similar, but the numbers don’t match up.

    The commandment against killing is #6 for Jews and Protestants, but #5 for Catholics. Stealing is #8 for Jews and Protestants, but #7 for Catholics. Then there are some bigger differences.

    For Jews #2 says “You shall have no other gods beside me. You shall not make for yourself a sculptured image, or any likeness of what is in the heavens above or on the earth below, or in the waters under the earth.” That’s effectively split into #1 and #2 for Protestants, with #1 being “no other gods” and #2 being “no graven images”. For Catholics, “no other gods” is #1, but they got rid of the bit about graven images, presumably so they can have old finger bones people can worship, or statues to Mary. So, for Catholics #2 says not to take the name of their god in vain. Catholics make up for that by having a commandment against coveting the milf next door and a second one about your neighbour’s stuff, whereas Jews and Protestants have just 1 commandment against coveting your neighbour’s stuff.

    Also, the Jews didn’t seem to understand the assignment for #1, because it’s not actually a commandment, it’s backstory: “I am the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, the house of bondage.” So, Jews really have 9 commandments and 1 informational message.

    Also, fun loophole. All 3 versions say “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.” #9 for Jews and Protestants, #8 for Catholics. But, if someone isn’t your neighbour… Loophole!

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If you talk to many american christians, then the answer is whatever they personally learned or believe. You must believe the same as them and their arbitrary translation of the Bible. All other possibilities are blasphemous and a personal attack on them.

      Source: my parents and my entire childhood in school and church

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      They needed #1 since they were never in Egypt to begin with. All archaeological evidence points to the Israelites being Cannannites that decided to kill their cousins, and claim they weren’t related. They attached themselves to Egypt because Egypt was more powerful back then than the Mittani and the Assyrians.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Still doesn’t make it a “commandment”.

        A commandment is an order like “You shall not murder.” It is an action that you could take, but are being ordered not to take. How would someone violate the Jewish 1st commandment?

        If it were something like “I am the Lord Your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage, and you shall never suggest that that isn’t what happened”, then it would be a commandment. As it stands, it’s not a commandment, it’s just backstory.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Episode 31 of the Data Over Dogma podcast covers some of the issues with the “10” commandment. If you haven’t checked them out you may be interested.

      Edit: sorry I should have double checked the spelling, it’s fixed now!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t even have to go that far. Just put them up in Spanish and half the state will lose their fucking minds.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’ll probably claim that violates the “easily readable font” part of there law that should be unconstitutional.

  • noneya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m certain Louisiana classrooms could also use a few verses from The Satanic Bible, too. The Ten Non-Commandments? Maybe we throw it back to the Papyrus of Hunefer or the Epic of Gilgamesh, since Christianity is so derivative.

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is presumably being done in collaboration with the supreme court to give them a test case to permit establishment of the Christian religion in schools.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well that would be pretty difficult, they’d have to pretend like the 1st Amendment doesn’t exist. Don’t forget that they’ve all had to take the oath of office requiring them to swear to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nope, completely serious.

          Maybe it’s time you realized that what you’re saying is a conspiracy theory, literally. That is what the trumptards do, as they are addicted to turning everything they’re worried about into a conspiracy theory against them. But not everything is a conspiracy, most things are not.

          • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you think that SCOTUS is not signaling the kinds of cases they want to get (at, say, Federalist Society meetings and speeches), you’re not paying attention.

            The electors plot and preparation for the J6 coup attempt were also conspiracies.

            • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              With the Big Lie election conspiracy and Jan. 6th we had clear indications visible to the public and documented communications outlining their conspiracies.

              What you’re promoting now is a conspiracy theory that Louisiana lawmakers are conspiring with the Supreme Court justices to legalize Christian theocracy. Where is the documentation to back up your conspiracy theory? Can you list any examples of publicly visible collusion, communications between those parties?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Please speak to the people sitting beside you in the pews.

      They don’t seem to care what us godless heathens have to say. Maybe they’ll listen to a fellow believer.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do - just not when we’re in the pews.

        I will never discuss politics at church in the same way that I will never discuss religion at a City Council meeting. Separation of Church and State is good for both institution.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not like there’s a shortage of intra-Christian violence over interpretations of scripture. You can be a devote Christian and still know enough history not to pine for the 30 Years War or the Inquisition.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      These two things are mutually exclusive. Lol

      Pray tell, tho. Wtf are you on about???

      • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You don’t see any potential issues with removing the viewpoint of other cultures and adding prescriptive religious iconography to classrooms, or how they could be related?

  • FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    Welp, I can see it’s time to re-up as a member with the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, and maybe a few more. I haven’t been active in the Church:State fight since the early 2000s when GWB was kissing-up to Christofascists but the latter are really gaining momentum of late now that they have Their People in power from the SCOTUS on down to the lowliest municipal admin spot. We as a country are truly f*cked if we don’t neutralize these people. I’ll probably join TST too because I agree with them ideologically, they’re doing some great women’s health care work, and I want to make sure that I get on all the Christofascist’s Lists as a certified Demonic influencer.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    I want the ten Commandments of the satanists church then as well, with a little sweet Baphomet statue next to it to drive the point Home

    • crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’d prefer the Seven Fundamental Tenets of the Satanic Temple. Also cute little Baphomets would be amazing!

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I want the ten Commandments of the satanists church then as well

      No such thing.

      The Church of Satan has the Nine Satanic Statements but I think you mean the Seven Tenets of the Satanic Temple? Either way, neither comes in a quantity of ten.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Was wondering if ToS will be placing their tenants beside these.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I honestly think this was part of their plan. Enact a clearly unconstitutional law, get someone to sue get it escalated all the way to the Supreme Court, and have the Supreme Court somehow pull out of their ass that it’s constitutional.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Who at all did not see this coming? At this point we as a country just waste resources so the people in the back can push their little christofascist agendas.

  • iz_ok@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    What’s also upsetting is that they passed or are set to pass a bill allowing state funding to private schools.