What’s your favourite to use? Mine is Fish due to its ease of use and user friendly approach.

Bash is the pepperoni of shell tools being reliable in every field no matter what but I’ve moved to Fish as I wanted to try something different.

So what’s your shell of choice?

  • lengau@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    6 months ago

    Bash

    Not because it’s the best or even my favourite. Just because I create so many ephemeral VMs and containers that code switching isn’t worth it for me.

    • Technus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seconded. Having an awesome Fish setup doesn’t help at all when you’re constantly having to shell into other machines unless you somehow keep your dotfiles synced, and that sounds like a total hassle.

      I’d rather my muscle memory be optimized for the standard setup.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I use Ansible playbooks to keep my config in sync. It’s great but there is a bit of a learning curve. Makes it easy to deploy config changes.

    • smeg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly, I choose the one that’s always there on every machine I access!

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 months ago

    Definitely fish. It does everything i need out of the box. To achieve the same with zsh, i needed a dozen plugins on top of a plugin manager. Here, in satisfied with just Starship as custom prompt.

    That said, i’ve been trying nushell recently. Don’t really think it’s for me, but it is pretty interesting

  • brenticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Honestly? Bash. I tried a bunch a few years back and eventually settled back on bash.

    Fish was really nice in a lot of ways, but the incompatibilities with normal POSIX workflows threw me off regularly. The tradeoff ended up with me moving off of it.

    I liked the extensibility of zsh, except that I found it would get slow with only a few bits from ohmyzsh installed. My terminal did cool things but too slowly for me to find it acceptable.

    Dash was the opposite, too feature light for me to be able to use efficiently. It didn’t even have tab completion. I suffered that week.

    Bash sits in a middle ground of usability, performance, and extensibility that just works for me. It has enough features to work well out of the box, I can add enough in my bashrc to ease some workflows for myself, and it’s basically instantaneous when I open a terminal or run simple commands.

    • piexil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      while I still use ohmyzsh, a lot of it’s opponents make it’s slowness one of its complaints. You don’t need ohmyzsh to have fancy things, it’s just makes setting it all up a little easier.

  • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I know I’m a heretic but I’m a huge powershell fan. Once you work with an object-oriented shell you’ll wonder why you’ve dealt with parsing text for so long. Works great on Linux, MacOS and Windows, it’s open source, reads and writes csv, json and xml natively, native web and rest service support, built-in support for remote computing and parallel processing and extensive libraries for just about anything you can think of. It takes a little getting used to but it’s worth it.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      TBH, I use Powershell on my Windows install, and they’ve made some good improvements over the years. I forget that it also works on Linux.

      Shame v1.0 ships with new installations, and you have to manually go out and install the latest versions to get the benefits. Dunno why MS doesn’t just automatically update it with everything else.

      • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Version 2 came with Windows 7. Version 5 comes with Windows 10 (and I think 11). V7 is the latest but being cross-platform doesn’t come with some of the Windows-specific modules built into v5.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        V1 never actually shipped with any version of Windows

        Windows 7 shipped with V2, 8 with V3, 8.1 with v4, and 10 with v5 and later 5.1.

        5.1 is the latest (and last) version of Windows PowerShell.

        All versions after that are just PowerShell (or PowerShell Core for version 6)

        Not sure why they don’t bundle it by default, but starting at v7.2 it can be updated by Windows update

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I use powershell by default on windows and I prefer it for scripting any day of the week vs. shell scripts. It’s not the fastest but you can always plug in .net to your scripts to dramatically improve performance. Sure, I could write the script in rust or whatever to make it even faster, but that’s way more work than I need for the lifespan of the script.

    • poinck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Even on Windows I try to avoid Powershell. I use bash through GitBash there, too. But, I don’t mind using Powershell for work, because some workflows are already implemented in ps1-scripts.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t try zsh, because you won’t be able to go back to bash after that 😉

  • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fish for an interactive shell, and I’ll often drop back to bash for writing a script. I can never remember how to do basic program flow in fish. Bash scripting is not great, but you can always find an example to remind you of how it goes.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Bash is fine. Zsh on Macs is fine too. I can’t stress how useful it is to learn busybox if you end up with a shell on an embedded device.

    All these crazy shells people talk about are kinda like race car controls. I’m not driving a race car, I’m driving a box truck with three on the tree.

  • MXX53@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    My job is working with a ton of servers over ssh. Bash is the most convenient balance between features and not needing to do any setup.