U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert faces voters in Colorado’s GOP primary election Tuesday after she fled a tough reelection race to run in a more Republican-leaning district, harried along the way by accusations of carpetbagging and still bruised by an embarrassing video.

Boebert, who planted her MAGA flag in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2020, has amassed conservative clout across the country. But that limelight has also meant public scandals. Her decision to switch districts came after video surfaced of her vaping and causing a disturbance with a date at a musical production of Beetlejuice.

Boebert said she made the switch to ensure another Republican could win her old district, which she nearly lost in 2022, and she blamed outside groups for targeting her. But Boebert left the district having already become a fundraising magnet for the likely Democratic candidate, who has pulled in millions that may help him flip a district that has leaned Republican in recent years.

On Tuesday, for the first time since all of that happened, Colorado voters will get their say. The ones in her new district will weigh her candidacy against more traditional GOP rivals. Those include former state Sen. Jerry Sonnenberg, current state Reps. Mike Lynch and Richard Holtorf and parental rights advocate Deborah Flora.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not even mentioned in the article! In what world does the author live that “vaping” was the scandal that prompted her to flee her district? Conservatives couldn’t care less that she was being rude with vape smoke at a play.

      • MdRuckus @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The lines were redrawn. Therefore she fled because she knew couldn’t win since she won the last election by a mere 500+ votes.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s literally the first line of the summary. There was a district that most closely matched her previous one, but she’s running in a district she doesn’t live in because it would be easier to win.

          • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            starts a semantic argument

            someone immediately proves you wrong

            This is a FUCKING STUPID ARGUMENT. It doesn’t matter whether I’m right or you are. It’s fucking semantics.

            Hahaha hot damn this is the stupid-little-shittest energy have ever seen. Are you a professional?

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            You literally started the argument you’re now upset about. For some reason you thought it was important enough to tell me I was wrong, but after people told you your interpretation is wrong (or at best, in your evaluation, pointless) you’re suddenly wondering why we’re even talking about it.

            You didn’t read the summary and felt compelled to make a point no one else here or in political coverage agrees with, just tuck your tail and slink away.