Talk’s Julia Hartley-Brewer takes on American commentator Jackson Hinkle, who tweeted about her looks on the site while accusing her of being a “genocide defender”.

“I’m glad you are making good money out of doing this,” Julia tells Jackson.

Summary 1:

1. Julia challenges the guest’s double standard in justifying certain actions while condemning others.
2. Personal attacks on social media detract from the intellectual discourse and undermine the credibility of arguments.
3. The debate highlights the importance of focusing on substantive arguments rather than resorting to ad hominem attacks.

Summary 2:

1. The speaker visited four homes in [Donbas] that were bombed by Ukrainian missiles.
2. The town is not currently experiencing active fighting.
3. The speaker believes that the people of Palestine and [Donbas] are both being oppressed.
4. The interviewer accused the speaker of justifying Putin’s actions in Ukraine due to past events.
5. The speaker believes that the interviewer is picky with what they consider to be a provocation.
6. The interviewer asked if the speaker had reported on the events in 2014.
7. The speaker tweeted a picture of the interviewer and called them a “genocide defender.”
8. The interviewer asked if the speaker believed that attractiveness was relevant in arguments.
9. The speaker stood by their tweet and found it hilarious.