I’ve been a blood donor for most of my adult life, and have donated about 30 liters. Where I’m at you get a token donation and a thanks for donating, but someone mentioned that in the US you get paid quite a lot depending on the quality and the blood type.

I have a fairly uncommon blood type (about 10% of the population) and a blood count of around 150.

So, how wealthy would I have been if I had donated my blood in the US instead?

  • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re thinking of plasma, people can get paid for that. Donating blood just gets you a cookie, the satisfaction of helping people in need, and a sticker.

    • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah. The motivation was never money. I was just curious since I heard that you got paid in the US. Apparently I was misinformed.

      • Rednax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Where I live, the places that do blood donations, also do plasma donations. The process is longer, but is otherwise a similar experience. And since plasma is extracted from blood, it is not entirely wrong to argue that people can get paid for blood donations in the US. It is not accurate, but I would argue the statement is probably based on a truth.

        • irotsoma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          The process might be similar on the withdrawal side, but they are used for very different things. Blood is used to replenish the blood of someone undergoing surgery or who was injured or whatever. Plasma is not given to people. It’s used to make pharmaceutical products primarily. So it’s the difference that one is a necessity to modern medicine and a hell of a lot of it is needed or people will definitely die and much of modern surgery wouldn’t be possible. The other is an ingredient for for-profit products.

  • Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think FDA rules explicitly prohibit paying blood donors in the US. Ostensibly because if you do, the donation centers fill up with junkies who’ll lie about not having hepatitis so they can get paid, or steal IDs so they can go twice a week until they die of anemia, raising the costs of safety testing and generally being injurious to public health. Of course, everyone else involved in the process gets paid, just not the donors – quite dearly, as you’ll learn if you’re ever on the receiving end of a transfusion.

    Plasma is paid because it falls under a different regulation and their research and industrial customers don’t care that the plasma came from a crack whore.

  • b000rg@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    For whole blood, I’ve only ever been given a t-shirt. For plasma alone though, it was purely dependent on your weight and, therefore, how much they can take from you in the one session. I’m a tiny dude who barely weighed enough to qualify and got about $80 a couple years ago. It’s honestly not worth it at all, but if you’re broke it’s easier than many other options. The place was full of the “undesirables” of society because of that. It drained me emotionally, seeing how blatantly exploitative it is.

    Edit to add: these plasma donations can be done with a tighter window between them too, so the people who were always short on cash were in there every 2 weeks.

    Edit again: I forgot that that was an introductory deal where they give you an extra $40, so it was actually $40 for me. Overweight patients could get around $70-$80.

    • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thanks for the answer. So, not wealthy at all then. Good to know.

      Fun fact, whenever my blood gets used to help someone, I get a text message telling me, and a thanks. Enormously satisfying.

      • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Considering the super shady practices involved with plasma “donation”, and the fact that it’s used to make very expensive cancer drugs, take your text and good vibes. That’s literally the better outcome.

        Most of the world won’t even buy US plasma because of the really lax collection regulations and super sus conditions of most of the plasma centers (basically the fact that it’s paid and on such short turnaround causes a lot of people to game the system, it’s dangerous, and potentially unsanitary/risky.)

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    What they mentioned is unusual. I’m sure some people somewhere pay, but it’s against the norm and even against the rules. Some of us have to fight for even just the anonymity to be dropped.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Hospitals won’t accept paid blood transfusions, but there are two paid markets for what they CALL donations but are sales.

      If this person was talking about paid transfusions there’s a subset of parasite that literally just pays young people for elective red cell transfusions. This was actually a plot point in Silicon Valley and it wasn’t a bad depiction of the relationship. Basically, it makes the recipient feel a little more energetic because that’s literally how blood transfusions work, but these old leeches think there’s something special about it

      The other is just paid plasma. It’s got a lot of use in industry but regular apheresis is both time consuming and much more risky than they pretend, so they have to offer financial incentives. This blood (plasma) is NOT transfused directly, it is used in various industries for anything from hemophilia treatments to makeup.

      Direct transfusions have a higher risk to the recipient so accepting paid transfusions is just not worth it if you have any choice at all, and the nature of paid plasma products demonstrates quite readily why it’s an unacceptable risk, even with improved testing. Hemophiliacs were actually the highest risk group during the AIDs crisis by 3x the rate of gay men. You simply cannot trust people to be safe with other people’s health when money is involved.

      Don’t think too much about the implications for for-profit healthcare as a whole.

        • philpo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because then people who urgently need money do everything to get that money.

          E.g. lie in that questionnaire. And you know who needs a lot of money? Intravenous drug users. Who tend to share needles. And have a higher risk of high risk sexual behaviour (both from prostitution itself but also rape, infections in their mucosal areas,etc)

          • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Right… but I was asking about the technical method itself.

            I’m pretty sure they’d check your blood before you proceed.

            • philpo@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              the problem is that blood can be check only so thoroughly - some illnesses only develop much later and can only be tested for then, especially on a large scale. That’s why in most countries the first donation is not actually used for anything besides testing.

              Anyway, plasmapheresis/apheresis has the risk of a reaction to the sodium citrate that is used as a anticoagulant - there are systems that use no sodium citrate but they increase the risk for embolisms. Sodium citrate can cause hypocalcaemia, seizures,hypertention and a few more things,but generally it’s safe in the donor setting.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve only donated a few times but from what I recall you can donate blood or sell plasma. Always struck me as weird but the difference is that they use the whole blood medically while the plasma only is used for research or commercial purposes. We do love to make a market for near everything possible here.

    As for how much, not sure exactly since I haven’t done so myself but I get the impression it’s not huge, maybe $20-$50 each time.

      • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Huh, odd that they don’t advertise it more then. Probably make the notion of selling it get less of a rep of desperate people needing money and more similar to donating blood as an altruistic thing, so you get more involved.

  • ChexMax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    In my area you get a gift for donating. Usually a T-Shirt, but often a T-Shirt and a movie ticket, or a $10 gift card or once I got an insulated lunch box. The movie ticket era was nice because you could donate blood with your significant other and then go to the movies together, and feel good about donating. A good but weird date every couple of months

    • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Actually this isn’t normal in the US. Giving regular people money for selling their blood, a form of passive income. Seems far fetched. The healthcare industry ruins people financially not help them.

      • reesilva@bolha.forum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        how isn’t a bad thing having a price in blood? why did everything become a product there? It means that people are so selfish that only money is capable of making them do something. Blood donation should be a voluntary act, not having a price in it o.O

          • reesilva@bolha.forum
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Especially because at school we learn that it is important to donate, blood and organ, because it helps other people and maybe can save lives, not because we can take profit out of it.

          • reesilva@bolha.forum
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I feel sad for you, bro, for how selfish you are. Try to get some money from doing something that could save lives.

            • BigPotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’d give for free if they gave it for free. They rip people off for the stuff I freely gave? No, I’ll take a few bucks out of their profit, thanks.

              Besides, I usually can’t donate anyway but I give that shit all the time when I can. Especially when I know where it’s being used (for free.)

              • reesilva@bolha.forum
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                So that’s the problem with the USA. Why does the country allow companies to make profit with people’s blood? That’s ridiculous. This is the type of thing that happens when you allow everything to become a product, even stuff from your body. It is like insulin, that people die for not having money to buy, and it is not that expensive, but someone has to get some profit from others’chances to survive. This is selfish at it’s maximum.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Look, of the people collecting my blood are turning around and selling it for a lot of moeny, shouldn’t I get some of the money? That’s all folks are saying. I agree people should want to do it to be a good citizen to their fellow humans, but the people getting the blood should also not be making money off of it in that case.

              So if the answer to “How much is blood worth?” is “Nothing!” Then awesome! If the answer is “A lot, actually…” Then something is wrong.

              • reesilva@bolha.forum
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Check the answers. It is, indeed, “a lot” sometimes and it happens just to allow companies to have huge profits. To do so, they allow people to have a small profit and it means let some people die if they don’t have enough money to make riches richer. The USA is a country working upside down, bro.

  • plactagonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Where I am you get about 100 € tax write off per donation, one donation is about 0.5l so you could write off about 6 000 € from your personal tax returns.

      • plactagonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Czech Republic, it has some requirements like it has to be voluntary, in good faith…

        But basically you get 3000 czk write off per donation max 12 000 czk per year (you can donate every 3 months).