Discuss.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think you’re maybe reading too much into it… pretty sure it was just intended to be a hypothetical for discussion, not an attempt to learn about disabilities. It’s like, “Would you rather have unlimited money but be perpetually depressed, or always be happy but be perpetually broke?”

    If someone who actually has no legs came in and offered their opinion, that’d be a bonus, but it doesn’t strike me as the intended purpose of the post.

    If there’s anyone here who actually has no legs who is offended by this, I’d be interested to hear from them, but… if you have legs (because you’re clearly literate), are you sure you’re not just taking offense by proxy where none should exist or was intended?

    • JoBo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      pretty sure it was just intended to be a hypothetical for discussion

      Exactly. How the hell you constructed the rest of your thoughts around that basic fact is beyond me.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, you seem to have constructed your objection around a completely different premise, so… if this is a basic fact, than what is your objection, really?

        • JoBo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know what the fuck is going on in your head but my objection is to dehumanising discussions of disabled people. How is that so very hard to understand?