• orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    How could it be devaluing? That is the point. That’s why she said it.

    • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s devaluing, because Boebert named diversity as a reason to hire Karine, not her professional qualities.

      • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You forgot the implication that black women couldn’t possibly be skilled or smart enough to be hired. Because they’re black. That’s the racist part. It’s devaluation stemming from racism.

        • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          5 months ago

          It appears that Boebert has said that about particular women, not all of them.

          So I wouldn’t necessarily imply racism here. Common devaluation - sure.

          • orcrist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Bad chatbot. You can’t switch between sexism and racism without even attempting to connect the two.

            • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Ok.

              It appears that Boebert has said that about a particular women person of colour, not all of them.
              So I wouldn’t necessarily imply racism here. Common devaluation - sure.

              Is that better?

              P.S. My first language is Russian, and we usually refer to a 3rd person by it’s gender. That’s why I defaulted with “woman” instead of more broad “person”.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        you’re almost there… just explain what kind of diversity and you should arrive.

        • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          DEI is not racism (in theory). It’s a tool to fight one (in theory).

              • Chaotic Entropy
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The original poster was saying that Lauren Boebert is racist for calling her a “DEI Hire”… not the concept of “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion”.

                • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I just was being lazy and didn’t type the whole “DEI hire”. But I’ve meant it.

                  I think, being called “DEI hired” is not necessarily racism but a common devaluation / belittlement.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because one, LB has no idea of the qualifications or hiring process involved. And two, even if she did, believing the DEI is not a requirement to overcome racism in hiring is continuing to empowering racism. It’s still a big problem, whether it’s impacted you or not.