• In short: The Melbourne Symphony Orchestra admits it made an error when it pulled pianist Jayson Gillham from an upcoming performance over comments he made about the killing of journalists in Gaza.

  • The MSO said it made an “error” in cancelling his performance, but maintains their concert was not an appropriate place to express personal views.

  • What’s next? The orchestra’s August 15 concert, which was expected to go ahead without Mr Gillham, has now been cancelled due to security issues but the MSO wants to reschedule the performance.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not really.

      Yes they amplified what the guy said, but they also distanced themselves from his views.

      Suppose the orchestra has wealthy pro-israel benefactors. The MSO committee might agree with what piano-face said, but as an organisation they may have felt obligated to uphold a non-partisan position.

      The Streisand effect is when you try to delete content. In this case they just tried to disclaim it.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        And as you said , amplified it. If you think silencing criticism of a genocide to appease donors is not showing your politics, then what is?

        I didn’t mean they held the same views. Rather, the opposite. Or at least indifference, which from the perspective of the performed, amounts to the same.

        Holding a non partisan pisition would be saying they dont share his views nor think it was an appropriate place for it, but not try to cancel him.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        to uphold a non-partisan position

        There’s nothing non-partisan about cancelling someone for stating facts.