• Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
    3·
    3 months ago

    I disagree.

    Well, you’re wrong.

    You believe there have been “a ton” of human societies with no exploitation? You have no idea what you’re talking about.

    There have been a ton of societies which limited the amount of power individuals could amass.

    Oh I see! Distinct differences! LOL

    Yeah. Feudal property relations are totally the same as capitalistic property relations. No difference whatsoever. Pretty much everyone is still a subsistence farmer. /s

    • rahEnglish
      14·
      3 months ago

      Well, you’re wrong.

      LOL

      limited

      Ah! So now you’re changing your tune! Not “preventing” but “limiting”. Best of luck, maybe you’ll get to reality in the end.

        • rahEnglish
          1·
          3 months ago

          Why are you asking me that?

            • rahEnglish
              11·
              3 months ago

              I’m neither saying nor implying that.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
                1·
                3 months ago

                Yes you are:

                “We” cannot stop human beings from gaining power over others so the question is moot.

                • rahEnglish
                  11·
                  3 months ago

                  I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase:

                  “We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netEnglish
                    1·
                    3 months ago

                    No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation.

                    Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?