• UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I think most audience that wanted to see it came for the clapter value to begin with and other people didn’t bother to review it.

    It’s “God is Not Dead” for… basically the same fucking demographic, really.

    • AmericaDeserved711 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      yeah, rotten tomatoes actually verifies audience scores now, and only chuds are buying tickets to this movie, so its ridiculously skewed. only boomers actually review stuff on RT anyway

      rotten tomatoes is a mostly useless website and it’s funny to me how people compare the critic and audience scores as if it means something

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        Chuds tend to see any difference between critic reviews and audience reviews as a sign of the DEI/woke/SJW cabal out to get them. grill-broke

        • AmericaDeserved711 [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          the audience score exists solely for chud confirmation bias at this point. like how many people even have an account on RT (other than right-wing trolls)? most people who actually like watching and reviewing movies use letterboxd