In my humble opinion, the Technology community should only contain text news/articles or even news pictures.

I simply think that tech videos does not belong to this community, as there is already a videos community which would be more suitable for this.

What does the mods think about this?

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s fine, if the poster really doesn’t want to include it in the original post for some reason.

    If you’re asking me to do it, I absolutely do when I post videos. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect others to do the same.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect others to do the same.

      Yes, it is. For a deep dive video a summary is easily several paragraphs long. Not only takes it time to write the summary, for a deep dive it would include making notes during the video, pausing several times, etc. In such a case of a deep dive, this can be an hour of work. So if you want summaries, you do the work. Don’t demand that from others and claim this is somehow a compromise.

      • Mr_Blott
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You said it, a summary of a deep dive video is a few paragraphs

        Don’t fucking post a two hour video that contains a few paragraphs of info then

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Exactly. And with AI tools, getting a transcript and generating a summary shouldn’t be all that hard.

          All I’m looking for is a handful of bullet points that give me a reason to watch the video. I’m not watching a random video someone posts just based on the headline, I need a bit more reason to invest my time to contribute to the discussion. And if you provide a basic summary, I’ll probably do the legwork and find some articles to add to the discussion while I’m watching the video.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Exactly. And with AI tools, getting a transcript and generating a summary shouldn’t be all that hard.

            Write a summary bot then.

            I’m not watching a random video someone posts just based on the headline

            Then don’t.

            I need a bit more reason to invest my time to contribute to the discussion.

            You’re not that important. If you don’t contribute to a discussion just because the submission is a video, nobody will notice.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m not specifically talking about myself, I’m explaining the sentiment I see here. Me personally not contributing to those posts probably won’t impact anything, and that’s fine. But there’s a lot of pushback from people who prefer text.

              All I’m saying is to put in a little effort to link a relevant text article or add a few bullet points that the video covers. That’s it. The barrier to posting stuff should be a little higher than just sending links to things that seem somewhat interesting.

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                I’m explaining the sentiment I see here.

                The sentiment here is that a loud minority cries about a tiny fraction of submissions when they could just not watch the videos in the first place.

                All I’m saying is to put in a little effort to link a relevant text article or add a few bullet points that the video covers. That’s it.

                Literally nobody is stopping you from doing that for other submissions. Don’t task unpaid community members to do work for you, just because you don’t like videos.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I mean, I do that sometimes, and it’s honestly not hard. If I post a video, I post a short summary about why I think it’s relevant. I expect the same from others.

                  And no, I’m not paid either.

                  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I mean, I do that sometimes, and it’s honestly not hard.

                    Keep doing it for your stuff, don’t try to make a rule for others to do the same.

                    I expect the same from others.

                    That’s the problem. You shouldn’t. It’s not your call to make. Deal with it.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Don’t fucking post a two hour video that contains a few paragraphs of info then

          You clearly don’t know what a summary is. I can summarize Lord of the Rings in three sentences. The details are still important.

          If you don’t want to watch such a video, DON’T WATCH IT! Don’t forbid others to like what they like!