• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Then do if for your distribution then. It’s clearly not that difficult, you’ve all but explicitly stated as much.

        • rahOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Then do if for your distribution then.

          I use Debian.

          It’s clearly not that difficult, you’ve all but explicitly stated as much.

          I have not said that, or anything like it.

          Perhaps you missed the fact that I’m not a Home Assistant user and have no interest in contributing?

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            So then it isn’t actually that feasible then, otherwise you’d do more than just whine about it on the Internet. Especially when there are valid reasons to not support that method.

            • rahOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              it isn’t actually that feasible then, otherwise you’d do more than just whine about it on the Internet

              So let me get your logic straight: you’re saying that it isn’t feasible because if it were feasible then a person who could do it would necessarily do it? LOL that makes no sense.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Well, yeah. Especially when you’ve already been given reasons why it isn’t. But clearly you know better than the devs or people familiar with the product.

                • rahOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Well, yeah.

                  Why do you think that because a person could do something they necessarily will?

                  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 days ago

                    Why do you think that because a person could do something they necessarily will?

                    I don’t, but in this case, we know it’s not because they got rid of that option. Why? Because the task is infeasible to support. Kinda like you’ve been arguing against this entire time in the face of multiple reasons why people aren’t doing it.

                    You’re far from the first person to want this, and the devs no longer offer it as a supported method for a reason after all. No one is saying it is impossible, just not something that’s feasible to create and support. This really should not be this hard of a concept to understand.