• Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In the simplest possible terms: people do not come back from the dead. That is an impossible thing.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And how do we know this?

        • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Logic and reason from billions of people’s shared experiences on the earth.

          Feel free to die and return and prove me wrong.

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So, you’re saying Jesus didn’t rise from the dead because it’s impossible. And that we know it’s impossible because nobody’s risen from the dead, which should include Jesus because you reject that he rose from the dead because it’s impossible.

            Isn’t this circular reasoning?

            • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Sure. Whenever discussing religion one will fall into circular reasoning, because faith itself is circular reasoning. One cannot use logic or reason to get out of a position that logic and reason did not get them into.

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                How is faith circular reasoning?

                • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  And forgive me for my use of “impossible” earlier, that’s not my position.

                  “Highly improbable” is a way better qualifier.

                  Not going to edit it because it ruins the context.

                  • Flax
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 minutes ago

                    Well, it is highly improbable, because only a few people have, either by this aforementioned person or himself. And it requires supernatural powers.

                  • Flax
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 minutes ago

                    Then our belief in anything can be put to circular reasoning