• cadekat@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 小时前

    I’d argue that people got way too excited about what NFTs offer. Being able to own/transfer a digital item with a standardized interface is interesting technically (and has real value, for example ENS names), but holy hell did people go all Beanie Baby on them…

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 小时前

      That’s not arguing with my point though, people definitely did get excited about perceived value, but it didn’t really benefit most people in any way because it was only a promise, not an actual thing

      LLMs and other generational AI produce something that immediately has value

      If I ask chatgpt to write me a python function I now have a python function I can use, if I ask it to explain something and then attempt to apply that knowledge I’ve learned something useful

      If I bought an nft the value of that nft would only be what people decide it is worth

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 小时前

        Oh, sorry, I wasn’t intending to argue against your main point. For the most part, I agree with you.

        What I don’t agree with is that the value of NFTs (as a technology) is dubious. Instead I think it’s overstated.

        In the same vein as “LLMs can write Python”, NFTs provide ownership information. Regardless of what some asshat pays for a picture of a monkey, the underlying technology still has merit.