• pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The classics are the point. These aren’t meant to be secretive killings, the signature is the message.

    They would use a different method if they wanted to obscure responsibility, dispose of the body, or do any number of things differently. Because they didn’t, means it was a public signing statement.

    Whether it was intended for one recipient, or many, who’s to say. Either way, you can be sure the intended party, or parties, received it.

      • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you often find yourself in tall buildings and alone with oligarchs or siloviki?

        If so, sure why not.

        • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So not the coworker who heats fish in the break room microwave? They’re not rich nor Russian … at least I don’t think so. I better be safe and just do it.

    • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      These aren’t meant to be secretive killings, the signature is the message

      Sure, but would it kill them to spice things up every once in a while?

      • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s unfortunate that this method was initially used because it was an intentionally ambiguous method of assassination, whereas now it’s a signature assassination, with only a sprinkling of ambiguity for their local media.

        Just think, if they had started with tragic hot air balloon accident, death by misadventure with a jet ski, or pet bear mauling?