• Kronusdark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I think given the current political situation this is the right call. No one knows what the Russian government might compel otherwise innocent devs to do.

    That said, we (and I mean society, not any particular individual) should be mindful that we don’t slip into bigotry.

    • geography082@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      Linux Fundarion is based in America. It needs to follow its rules and politics. I guess a lot of things will happen after this. As something so important for open technology like It , should be based in a more open, mor asvanced in laws and neutral territory.

  • hitwright@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’m surprised how many people treat GPL to ignore borders. The IP law still operates only by the rules your country decides.

    I can understand the desire for information to be free, but unless Open source movement becomes it’s own country the discussion should end there.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    altlinux devs:
    oh come on we are not trolls

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Save your sanity and do Settings -> Blocks -> Block instance -> lemmy.ml

    Also perhaps block me if you strongly disagree with the above.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Please stip blocking people, please stip talking about blocking everyone

      Yes, i gettit. Different opinions can be annoying but if we don’t all participate in. A similar environment.we all just disappear in our little echo chamber pillars, unable to hear or understand the others, which leads to more extremist opinions on all sides.

      We NEED to hear others, if not just for the fact that others may NEED to hear our voices too.

      I honestly this echo chamber crap is squarely caused by the Internet, the tool that promised to bring humanity together, and instead ended up dividing us more than ever because anyone hearing an opinion they don’t like immediately bans that voice. Can’t have anyone disagreeing now!

      I get it, there are some stupid opinions out there, dangerous ones too, but the more we ban them, the more they will only be able to talk eachother into extremism and the WILL be back, with more people, and more extremist opinions.

      FFS, we need to learn to start listening to each other again. An entire generation has grown up with “if you don’t like to hear that opinion, just have it banned”, and it’s not helpful.

      Early Internet was a wild west crazy town for sure, loads of assholes lurking around, but it was better than what we have now, where EVERY space is curated and hawkishly guarded against those that might even look in the wrong direction.

      I’ve spent quite some time on right wing subs back in the day in Reddit, discussing whatever topic with hard line conservative right wing types and when you do you find out they are human too, usually with a lot of fears, and you actually get to understand why they feel the way they feel, and you can get them to understand that yeah, maybe it’s not the best solution. You find common ground and got somebody a little closer to the light. Yes, I’m a big fan of that black guy (forgot his name) who goes out to talk to KKK members to convert them away from the KKK.

      I know this isn’t for everyone, but a lot of us can and should step up and start talking, start listening. I’m not saying st all you should agree with a neo nazi, but you can listen to him or her, understand where they’re coming from, and have them do the same. Once you both see the humanity in each other you can actually make everyone be a little better.

      It’s better than the alternative where the inevitable outcome is that we’ll start having civil wars everywhere and just kill those we oppose.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      Yesterday I accidentally commented in .ml and mentioned that voting third party in our current voting system is playing with fire to get a worse candidate in office. I was told I must therefore start a grassroots movement for ranked choice voting, because apparently I can’t have an opinion without a movement.

      Normally I let a few downvotes get under my skin more than I care to admit, but in this setting it was kind of a badge of honor. Honestly it was kind of “fun” to see what people were saying.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That instance’s mods blocked me this morning lol.

      The amount of people simping for Russia in that other thread is insane. Apparently calling Ukraine a country of Nazis is fine, but saying Russia is a dictatorship is not lmao.

      If you see a tankie or pro Russia comment, 99% of the time it’s a lemmy.ml poster

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        Yeah, when I created my Lemmy account I had to choose an instance before knowing anything about Lemmy yet. And .ml seemed like the default one to choose, given https://join-lemmy.org/ told me it is ran by the devs.

        Oh well.

      • eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Doesn’t help if the admins think you’re not. Which is why I had to relocate a community because of admin content meddling and instance users shitstorming in a waterglass.

  • MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Linus is from Finland. Finns barely tolerate Russians under usual circumstances. These are not usual circumstances.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      True he could have banned them long ago, it’s his project in the end, but he didn’t, he only did it after the sanctions

  • Dayroom7485@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yo this comment section is a dumpster fire 🔥

    edit: Remember Russian propaganda’s goal is to sabotage free discussion and conversation. They achieve this by e.g. shitting in a comment section. That might explain what’s going on here. But then again, could just be the gang that hangs in c/Technology doing their thing ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • style99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Lots of pro-Russia bots in here pretending to be concerned about their sudden inability to sneak backdoors into the kernelopen source.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You have to be arguing in bad faith if you’re trying to say “citizens of nation shouldn’t be responsible for their nation”

    The open source benefit is not that they can directly impact it, it’s that their government can’t

    • dwindling7373@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If it was framed as a measure against possible government coordinated infiltration, sure. But that’s not the case.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      I don’t think that’s what they were saying, but I don’t think you’re making that point in good faith either.

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You know. I don’t like what the Russian leadership and military are doing. I feel like ultimately we’re in the cold war era. But you know, at the height of the cold war, radio operators around the world still worked Russian stations.

    Yes, there was a very clear policy, neither side talked about ANYTHING beyond their signal report and working conditions (information about radio, power output and aerial basically). At the height of the actual cold war, the individuals were not cancelled like this.

    Sanction the leadership, sanction the money, and sanction the military. But the normal people that are subject to the propaganda? I don’t understand the benefit in doing this. I also don’t see how the sanctions effect an open source project…

    Seems a bit weird. Maybe there’s information we’re not privy to, but on the face of it, just based on what we’re seeing. Seems like a very very odd move.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      57 minutes ago

      I am on your side and don’t understand the fury of down votes in this section regarding this stance. I am from a shit hole of a country too and if my life long contribution to open science (hypothetically speaking) could be so completely disregarded because of something ultra shitty that my country did, I would be super sad and probably mad at the OS community for leaving me behind so quickly.

      I also don’t understand the benefit of doing this. Most people seem to claim it’s for security reasons but that does not make sense to me. Closing doors to someone without any proof of malintent is so against open source philosophy that it is perhaps more damaging in its core. And being the kind of government Russia is (or for that matter Israel, China, USA etc etc) they will always try to gain cyber war advantage by such methods. This approach is therefore clearly unsustainable. You would only be able to give dev access to a handful of countries in the world.

      It sure as hell won’t scratch a dent in the Russian government’s armor when all these sanctions did not. It is not going to achieve 1/1000th of what all those ambargoes, frozen accounts etc aimed and failed to achieve.

      Therefore there is either missing information (external pressure to take this action) or this is simply an action based on personal judgement.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Therefore there is either missing information (external pressure to take this action) or this is simply an action based on personal judgement.

        Looking at the other post about NVidia drivers, I am starting to wonder if western governments (or perhaps just the US) are going after large orgs and suggesting how current sanctions should be interpreted. In which case, not sure I can then blame the Linux foundation, since you know, you don’t need government heavy breathing down your neck.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      60 minutes ago

      don’t understand the benefit in doing this.

      FSB wants backdoor in kernel. FSB notices subsystem maintainer is Russian, lives in Chelyabinsk. Can close eyes to backdoor, can pretend to review. FSB in Moscow make call to FSB in Chelyabinsk telling to buy heavy wrench at hardware store.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I don’t think this only happens now, governments like Russia, USA, China, Israel will likely always be making these attempts.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If that were true, surely they’d not trust ANY of their existing work, or at least any done since the Special War Operation. Wouldn’t that make sense?

        They’ve left the code, and removed the people arbitrarily. Seems a bit off to me.

      • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Same could be said for any intelligence service . it is better to focus on preventing and detecting these things through analysis and code reviews.

        And they could just offer boatloads of cash to someone in another country to insert something so this doesn’t really prevent anything it only isolates a certain subset of people.

        • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          So if we can’t completely 100% deal with a problem, we shouldn’t even try? I mean, you’re correct, but we can’t solve all problems at once. If we deal with at least one, then we’ve made progress. Then we can try to deal with the next one.

          • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            No but this doesn’t do anything to “deal” with the problem as anyone can built up trust like Jian tan showed. The argument that this makes us more secure is like saying closed source is more secure cause the hackers dont have access to the source.

            We have evidence of the US messing with nist standards so by that same logic should we assume all us actors are bad ?

            The solution is to verify the code maybe have multiple people from different locations have to review stuff. Build more checks into the process.

            The whole point of it being open is that it can be reviewed. It shouldn’t matter where the contributor is from as all code should be subjected to a rigorous review process.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t understand the benefit in doing this.

      Security. Torvalds did this for security.

      Is it really that hard to parse?

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And I’ll say the same here as I did above. If it was for security, their code is tainted too. It’s an arbitrary reaction that is not complete as a solution to anything.

        • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          They can check existing code. You have to be able to trust people who are contributing.

          They can check new code by these risky people as it comes in, but it why risk it?

  • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    How is this keeping to open source philosophies in any way?

    “No, you can’t work on this, you’re Russian.”

    I don’t support the Russian Government or its actions in any way, but these devs are probably not part of it. They maintain drivers for fucking ASUS hardware.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      This has nothing to do with open source. If Russians want to work on the Linux kernel, they’re absolutely free to do so, because the source code is free and open source. What they are being restricted from is getting their changes submitted to the normal Linux foundation trees. FOSS doesn’t mean you’re entitled to have the maintainer of a project look at your patches, it means you can use the software however you want.

      And yeah, it makes me sad that Russian kernel maintainers are being excluded. That doesn’t mean it’s a violation of open source philosophies (a maintainer can exclude anyone they want for any reason), it just means it’s an unfortunate policy due to international sanctions.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because there are both US and EU laws preventing code from countries deemed a threat. Torvalds is paid by the Ameircan Linux Foundation, which has to work under US law and he himself is an EU citizen. Also a lot of other developers are from those countries and if they do not comply, they could get into some pretty bad legal trouble.

      So it pretty much boils down to kick out the Russians or kick out all US and EU citizens and well we see Linus choice.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s the start, of course. One could always play good cop, bad cop: “I have to do this to comply with the law, sorry, there’s nothing else I can do.” What Linus has done here is play bad cop, bad cop: “the law says I have to obey sanctions, and by the way I support the sanctions and this move anyway.”

        • Vilian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          He didn’t banned the Russians when the war started, he could, and probably wanted, but didn’t so what’s your point?

        • eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Switzerland is being routinely strong-armed these days.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 minutes ago

            😯🤔 maybe I should look that up, where exactly 😂would be fun to work on RISC-V

      • Zomg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s not that hard of a choice either ofc, given one is essentially required.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So the Rest of the world should trust CIA, NSA contributions but not Russia’s FSB ? come on , opensource should be tolerant towards all espionage agencies no matter their skin color.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      This is the difference between political systems where one is really really bad but at least doesn’t regularly assassinate opponents in the most horrific ways, and allow people to speak their minds.

      I don’t trust the US any further than I can throw it, but no matter how you look at it, it’s the lesser evil.

      Hell, look at sports. If a Russian athlete wins you can pretty much disqualify them for doping without having tested them because they all do it and I feel sorry for them, I feel sorry for that situation. There is a reason (beyond this war) why Russian athletes weren’t allowed to compete at certain events, and it’s the insane amount of doping used by them. I’m sure these athletes don’t want to do this crap, but a state basically forces them to.

      I can see the worry about similar issues with developers.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      Replying because I need to think about how I’m going to vote for this comment and plan to come back later.

  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    “Those who don’t learn history are doomed to repeat it”. Back when Pearl Harbor happened, people started to see japanese citizens as enemies. Not solely the Japanese government to that time, but even the humble japanese, even if those had despises against their government. Almost a century after, humanity is making the exact same thing, this time involving Russians and Ukrainians, as well as Israeli and Palestinians (exactly, “both sides”). Like how it happened back in Pearl Harbor, the prejudice extended all the way to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Medical), the subject of this community and thread.

    I was born a Brazilian, without my consent. Also, without my consent, there is this thing called “Brazilian politics”. I hate both the current and the former governments. I have no money nor conditions to simply leave the country but even if I did, I’d stay born as a Brazilian. Everyone who meets a Brazilian readily asks things such as “how’s carnival, how’s samba, how’s football, how’s Neymar”. Being a Brazilian necessarily mean that I have to like those things? Being a Brazilian necessarily mean that I consented to the current politics within this country? If Lula is sided with Putin, does it necessarily mean that me, a Brazilian citizen unknown to Lula or the entire government (I’m just one among 220 million people), endorse him as well? Should I blame myself for my entire life for being born Brazilian? Should a Russian do the same? An Ukrainian? An Israeli? An Palestinian?

      • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        Indirectly common people are being seized from their humanity. I guess the disliking people know how immigration is not something freely accessible, lots of people around the world just don’t have the necessary conditions to leave the country where they were born against their own consent, be it Russia or whatever other country.