António Guterres says treaty will endure but urges US to remain amid reports of Republican plan to withdraw from the climate negotiating framework entirely

The world needs the US to remain in the international climate process to avoid a “crippled” Paris agreement, the UN secretary general has warned, amid fears that Donald Trump would take the country out of the accord for a second time.

António Guterres said the landmark 2015 agreement to limit global heating would endure if the US withdrew once again, but compared the prospective departure to losing a limb or organ.

“The Paris agreement can survive, but people sometimes can lose important organs or lose the legs and survive. But we don’t want a crippled Paris agreement. We want a real Paris agreement,” the UN secretary general said.

If the Republican candidate wins, his administration could withdraw the US from the UN climate negotiating framework entirely, according to reports. If he does so, it could require Senate approval for the US to rejoin.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      20 days ago

      Not to mention, the Paris climate accord was way too little too late and we’re all still falling way short of even those goals! We’re producing more co2 than ever before. Why the fuck are these people lying to themselves and everyone else? WE ARE FAILING MISERABLY, DISASTROUSLY TO FIHT CLIMATE CHANGE.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Who are these articles for? All those MAGAs who feel strongly about climate change, or Dems who would have voted for Trump if he’s commit to GHG reduction?

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    Drill baby drill. And in the mean time, import all the crude you can, refine it and sell. The shareholders must be paid!

    • TheUnicornOfPerfidy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      This is clearly sarcasm. I assume the down votes are actually in favour of climate change?

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yeah… I just refuse to use the /s … so I revel in the down votes instead.

        I have no clue how people can think the US becomes rich from drill baby drill. It’s private companies that drill and make the money, while subsidised to the hilt by the US government. Any non oil executive or oil shareholder that repeats the slogan u ironically is a moron!

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 days ago
    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/01/a-trump-presidency-could-cripple-the-paris-climate-agreement-warns-un-chief-antonio-guterres

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • danekrae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    21 days ago

    There is no such thing as bad publicity. People must really want that psycho back…

    “People need to know how bad he is” Because it worked so well before… I’m sure THIS article about him will convince someone this time…

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      There is no such thing as bad publicity.

      I am going to paste what I wrote in another thread this morning about Meg Whitman because this is just not true.

      she totally inundated California. Every other radio and TV ad was about her. There were posters every place the campaign could think to stick them whether or not it was legal. By election day, everyone was so sick of her that she did not even come close.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          First of all, that doesn’t prove that Trump won because of that.

          Secondly, gloating about a fascist getting into office because it showed I was wrong does not make you a good person.

          Hopefully there won’t be people like you in Britain. Enjoy seeing your fellow citizens get marched into concentration camps and take solace that you got to be happy about someone being wrong on the internet.

          • danekrae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            I never claimed to be a good person. That clearly isn’t important anymore.

            Ew, Britain. Almost as disgusting as america.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              “Almost as disgusting” as the country where the incoming president is going to march my queer daughter into a conversion therapy camp?

              Is that really what you’re going to go with? Because I want to make sure that’s what you are claiming right now.

              • danekrae@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 days ago

                You can do better than that…

                If you really want to put words in my mouth, why not try: “so you want to kill my daughter?!”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  Please answer the question. Is that or is that not what you are claiming? It is a yes/no question. Unless you are a troll, the thing I am now trying to determine.

    • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I can only speak for myself, but as someone who before 2020 didn’t care at all to get involved in politics (aka voting), hearing about this literal meme causing real problems for real people all the damn time certainly did get me to vote.

      Twice, now. When previously I couldn’t be bothered.

      This man is so terrible that he’s gotten me to vote just to do my part in making sure he stays the fuck out of office.