• BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    332
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember when I had my clearance, we were told anything we worked on was classified for a minimum of like 75 years, unless it was declassified earlier. I remember because they told is if we were 18, we could potentially legally talk about our work at the age of 93, assuming the classification wasn’t extended.

    Anyway, part of that briefing was the outlining of consequences should we leak any classified information. We were told if the information we leaked resulted in the death of an intelligence officer anywhere in the world, we could and likely would be tried for treason. And the punishment for treason during a time of war (Global War on Terror, amiright) could be death.

    So… He’ll be charged with treason like any of us plebs would have been, right? Right?!

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      they will probably make an exception for him because he’s a Very Good Businessman. just think about what he may have gotten in exchange for the list of spies. perhaps some compliments from putin, maybe even a pat on the back.

      • smayonak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        He probably got to avoid having sex tapes released. Epstein was probably working with multiple intelligence agencies. The Russians probably just paid the most for those videos.

    • davidagain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      101
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wouldn’t it be great if Trump had to follow the same laws as normal people. He’s a complete traitor to the country.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        At this point, I’d settle for even a subset of the same laws. It is somehow none of the laws.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I wouldn’t be surprised if he also trespassed the laws of physics. Luckily this is unlikely

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They were probably blustering about the treason thing.

      Because “treason” was specifically abused by Britain, the US Constitution puts specific requirements on the crime of treason. In particular, there have to be two independent eyewitnesses to the treasonous act. Meanwhile, the Espionage Act has no such prosecutorial burden, and the penalties are just as severe…

      • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s been a while since I had it, so you may be right. Though, I do remember they were very specific it would only meet treason if it resulted in an intelligence officers death, but I don’t remember under what Act or law they were interpreting from.

      • tegs_terry
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s all the same… Only the names are are changed

        Everyday