• ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s a lot of text, and yet, solving all of that is easier, faster and less expensive than nuclear.

    • HumanPenguin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Solving politics is cheap and fast.

      Utter crap. Solar power companies have been trying for 20 years.

      Its not like you came up with a new idea.

        • HumanPenguin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Only fails to make sense. If you failed to read any significant portion of the said wall of text.

          It was a wall because It was detailed in the history of solar power. Ill ELI5 for you.

          We have funded solar power for decades. By allowing the industry to charge equal to other fuels. Meaning, for 20 years or more, companies have been trying to build solar plants all over the nation. And those that got there made a fucking fortune. Until the Tories ended part of it nearly 14 years ago. They stopped the subsidies. But still paid the same rate as more expensive power.

          The problem with building solar is the politics from farmers and local communities. As the text described.

          So

          Solving politics is cheap and fast.

          Utter crap. Solar power companies have been trying for 20 years.

          Its not like you came up with a new idea.

          Of building solar over nuclear. We have been trying for decades.