Summary

The House Ethics Committee has expanded access to its report on Matt Gaetz, recently nominated for attorney general by Trump.

The report details allegations of sexual abuse and drug use, including claims Gaetz paid women for sex and had relations with a minor, which he denies.

While House Speaker Mike Johnson seeks to block public release, some Republicans demand transparency due to Gaetz’s nomination.

The Justice Department previously investigated similar allegations but declined to press charges.

Senate confirmation hearings are expected to intensify scrutiny.

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    I guarantee there’s something in that report we don’t know. Concealing the report already implies the allegations are true. It doesn’t actually save face at all. There’s either more victims, or it implicates someone else.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    All this attention is just going to help him. The guy is going to run for president now

    • Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I think there were two different investigations. I suspect the ethics committee one has fewer hurdles to overcome in order to make it public. (Don’t quote me on that—I may be mistaken)

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I feel like “resigning from your office” shouldn’t be a way to keep forever sealed the results of investigations that have already happened.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    People need to stop asking if they’re going to confirm him and start asking senators why they’re voting for a pedophile. Where is the line too far? At what point does appeasing Trump become a threat to nation?

    • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They’ll do recess appointments, claim they didn’t vote for him, and point the finger at Trump, who will end democracy.

      • Ænima@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Except, in a rare moment of spinal development, Moscow Mitch has already said there would be no recess appointments. Let’s hope that holds.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Too easy to deflect.

      “Matt Gaetz is the victim of leftist lawfare. If he was a pedophile, why hasn’t he been charged? Why do you want to punish people without due process?”

      And then some nonsense about how persecuted white men are.

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I should be ashamed of the amount of time I spend thinking about this electric boat shark situation.

  • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That’s the goal, imo. Which Republican politician will accept a clearly unacceptable pick? Who will bend the knee? If you oppose Trump’s pick, you’re being primaried (or worst in the long term)

  • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Given the “will of the people” with Trump having won a majority of votes, and given the statement “never interrupt your enemy when they’re making a mistake” I feel like the dems should just help nominate all of trumps picks. It’s a more crazy idea admittedly, but I think these are the interesting times we live in. Gaetz would literally be ineffective and hilariously stupid. Which would mean that every legal case wouldn’t matter over the next few years. If he picked someone (evil) competent like Barr again we’d be radically fucked. Gaetz means we have a chance of nothing happening for a while.

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think that’s my line of logic though. Why not accelerate. We either speed up the collapse, or we prove that “running government like a business” gets us this mess. The dems have for too long played the game of appeasement with complaints and limits. If the people want Trump, and they’re fine with the horror that brings them give them the whole package. It’s not like as if we can say “well but brown people will suffer more” or “trans rights” when all of this is being eroded away as it stands.

        My view is that this is a longer, cultural issue and sometimes putting it all out on display is a better option than just sitting idly by as things deteriorate.