• TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Such a facepalm concept

    Capitalists. We can’t regulate businesses, if a corporation is opperating unsafe, harming the environment, spreading hateful messages etc… the only check and balance we need is the free market, and the consumers voting with their wallets.

    Consumers vote with their wallets, This is unspeakable… we need the government to regulate to make sure the consumers don’t organize and vote with their wallets.

    • Blackmist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      The thing is Twitter costs, even at its height, under a billion a year to run.

      He could pull all advertising and run it to the end of his life as a hobby.

      But he can’t have that, because the line must go up and the workers must cower in fear whenever their boss stalks the building.

      • hylobates@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That and one of the thing with rich people is that they hate losing money whatever happens.

        So technically Melon could run Twitter at a loss for years but at one point, he will simply abandon it.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          He bought it to manipulate the election but at the same time would also like it to make profit because he’s an unreasonable prick.

          This was never going to end well.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          he will simply abandon it.

          That’s sounds wonderful, let’s go with that option