• Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Vampire anatomy expert here.

    They are totally like straws. You were dead on.

  • Ken Oh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Circa 2008 the wikipedia entry for vampire bat claimed that their teeth were like this. archive.org didn’t capture it at that time, but another page copied the whole thing: https://www.mundoandino.com/Argentina/Vampire-bat

    The bats incisor teeth are hollow, allowing them to suck blood in through the teeth like a straw, the saliva has several ingredients that prolong bleeding.

    My favorite thing about this is: where does the blood go once it hits the top of the tooth? Into the gums? Into the sinuses? Out the back of the tooth and into the mouth, removing the need of a straw in the first place?

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In the vampire documentary “Dead and loving it” distinct straw-slurping sounds can be heard so I think this is indeed correct.

    However when I was a kid I totally thought vampire bats also do the sucky-sucky not the licky-licky they actually do.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The Swedish radio show “Christer” called up the ambassador of Romania somewhere around 2014 (IIRC) to pop the question, and he confirmed the teeth were like straws.

    So there’s that!

  • BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think there’s been a shift in media here over the years. Older vampires, the formalwear “I vant to suck your blaaaad” types, often have very long teeth and leave only a couple of punctures after biting someone. It’s pretty reasonable to assume these are actually drawing the blood through their teeth like little syringes.

    Then as time goes on, vampires have gotten grittier and gorier. We’ve gone from beautiful damsels with tiny pinpricks on their necks, to staight up cannibalism. Vampires now just fuckin eat people sometimes. Somewhere in between, we did get a phase of vampires biting open the neck with a big gush of blood, and the now classic image of a vampire with blood all over their lower face. At this point it’s clear they’re just drinking it normally.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What made them change their mind? Pretty sure that’s always been part of the implication lol.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    When I was in middle school and first learned about gay men I thought one penis would have to open up somehow to accept the other penis as what I now know would be called sounding. Also knowing what I know now that would be pretty extreme even for sounding but I was a preteen fundie and had gotten all my sex ed from an anatomy and physiology book in the family library with 0 direction from any adult so in the absence of any better ideas that seemed like the most likely way that would work out. Anyway this is a great example of why puritans wind up so kinky; you have no idea what normal sex looks like so you just have to imagine it and sometimes the imagination comes up with some really weird shit and before you know it you’re having preteen wet dreams about stuff the human body doesn’t even do.

    • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was like 9 before they told me procreation didn’t involve a woman’s belly button.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Docking is foreskin play, inserting something into the urethra would be a type of sounding.

        But if you can sound with an entire human cock, you’re doing something pretty extreme shit

        • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m deeply enjoying this polite and intellectual discourse re: is this physically impossible act I imagined at 14 years old docking or sounding. Please continue this and all your other weird sexual internet discourse with the same level of polite fervor. :)

          • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Lmao. I’m not an expert on either docking or sounding, so if one comes along I’ll defer. Lol. But also, I doubt you’re the only kid who thought that. When I was much, much younger than 14 and learned about gay folk (before realizing I myself was gay folk) I didn’t understand the issue, because I didn’t realize sex played into it. I just thought a relationship/marriage was two people raising kids and makings dinner and shit. Lol. Didn’t understand why you’d go to hell for that being two men or whatever.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Kids understand things on a very basic level, which sometimes allows them to see through the societal bullshit that complicates life. Sure you were wrong about sex, but overall you were right.

  • Aksamit@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The opposite of that is kinda how I thought tattoo machines worked as a kid- as in with hollow needles and an ink cartridge, like fountain pens, and each poke into the skin would deposit ink that way. I even ‘figured out’ that the tiny vacuum from pulling the needle out would be what pulled the ink down into the skin.

    When I found out how tattoo machines actually worked, it seemed so messy (and loud!).

      • nepenthes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I looked it up:

        Tattoo needles are more like the nib of a fountain pen than a syringe; the ink isn’t shot down through the needle, but suspended at the end of it when an artist dips the tool into a well. Then, when the tip of the needle pierces a hole in the recipient’s skin (both the epidermis and the dermis beneath it), capillary action—the same force that makes liquid creep up the sides of a straw—draws the ink down into the dermis.

        Source: https://www.popsci.com/how-tattoos-work/

      • Aksamit@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        IKR? But yeah, nah, tattoo machines are basically a motor that pumps the needle up and down, and you have to dip it in ink to transfer it into the skin.