• merridew
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Makes sense. They have a massive overtourism problem and it isn’t sustainable.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is not a money-making move, he added, saying the fee would only cover the cost of administering the scheme.

    This just seems so pointless. 5 euros doesn’t seem like it’s going to significantly reduce the number of visitors, and it’s literally just a money pit.

    • Katzastrophe@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      5€ is pocket change for tourists, I’ve seen people buy selfie sticks for 20€ while in Rome

  • DieguiTux8623@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is just a maneuver to extort money from visitors. Venice is a public city and if the municipality needs money they can tax residents like any other city. Except that nobody want to live in Venice because of reasons, so they want to exploit tourists. If I were a foreigner, I would simply change my destination.

    • iain@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      nobody want to live in Venice because of reasons

      I wonder what the reason might be 🤔

      I would simply change my destination.

      Looks like it is already working!

    • merridew
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      nobody want to live in Venice because of tourists