renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1586arrow-down127
arrow-up1559arrow-down1imageThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squarePacattack57@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·13 hours agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-212 hours agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.