• alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ah yes, the people calling out the democrats for facilitating genocide are responsible for the democrats loss. If nobody called them out, genocide would have been extremely popular.

          Of course, if we had the power to sway the election, I wonder why the democrats didn’t just listen to us and stop facilitating genocide.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            theres a lot of centrists who say they will never forgive those who didnt vote. I’m not sure I’ll ever forgive centrists for not standing up to be counted in the uncommitted primary vote. Biden would have won anyway and it would have cost them nothing at all to do. Somehow they couldnt be bothered.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They say Biden, I hear complicit.

      It’s amazing how a being without a spine sat in the White House chair for four years without falling over.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Crime Bill Biden ran out the clock on purpose. He never had any intention to reschedule cannabis.

    NONE.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The only meaningful change for this would be via legislation, otherwise trump can just as easily undo it the same day.

      Edit: looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year (April): https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/update-deas-efforts-reschedule-cannabis-what-you-need-know-2024-09-11/ , I don’t understand this article

      Edit 2: the letter is actually asking him to try to hurry the process up (the article from September that I linked says there supposed to be hearing scheduled this Monday (Dec 2nd)). It is very misleading (as you can see from the comments), because it implies Biden is just ignoring this issue completely.

      https://lee.house.gov/imo/media/doc/letter_to_biden_admin_re_marijuana.pdf

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

          Unless of course it’s something he wants to do, like sell weapons for an ongoing genocide. Then all bureaucracy evaporates into nothingness.

          His hands are untied when he wants them to be.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Look, I get that you’re trying to make a point, but this is like complaining your parents were able to pay the mortgage every week but not buy you a new bike. One is planned, budgeted, agreed upon by all parties. The other is something you want, that takes time and planning which has yet to take place.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Giving away arms to a genocide isn’t… budgeted.

              What line item(s) can you point to for “Palestinian Genocide Budget”?

              There’s literally a law on the books that says he MUST stop arms transfers to Israel, since the UN has declared an ongoing genocide.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              The other is something you want, that takes time and planning which has yet to take place.

              One is something Biden wanted, and the other is rescheduling cannabis.

        • Starbuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Everything with government doesn’t have to be slow, but congress wrote this bill so that two successive presidents would have to keep pursuing it.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Trump can just undo it anyway. What’s the point. And saying that’s not how its done is pointless cause they don’t play by the rules.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year

        Right. He waited until it couldn’t be completed until after the end of his term. On purpose. He ran out the clock. On purpose.

        He never wanted to reschedule cannabis and dragged his feet until he didn’t have to.

      • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You still haven’t learned that US legal precedent is God king. New rules dropped, presidential acts are all the rage. Biden just has to say those two words and he can regulate how long your ball hair is allowed to be.

          • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Doesn’t fuckin matter. Let SCOTUS mull it over for years. Drag it out through court for 4 years to see if he was allowed to do what he did do. Someone tries to reverse what he did? Fire them, let SCOTUS figure out for 4 years if he was allowed to do that too. Convince 20 lawyers to fight it until they are literally disbarred. I’m sick of democrats fussing over decorum and tradition and just giving this country away because they’re afraid of some vague rules. Make shit up. Not allowed to fire that person? Spin up some special cabinet packed with cronies and make that person report to them now. Literally anything. But biden won’t do shit. He’s taking a fucking nap, leave him alone.

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You miss the part where the court gets to decide what is or isn’t an “official act”?

              • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Sure, if the court case goes before them, on average of 4 years after the actual crime. But seeing as the Jan 6th case was thrown out, it won’t matter what that determination would be if ignoring the Constitution and attempting to overthrow the government isn’t past the line.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        No the Democrats haven’t learned that, and are still taking the high ground.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do what? Pardon people from state crimes, which he cannot do. Or write legislation making marijuana legal, which he can’t do?

      The reason charges for drugs are different in every state is because they are state laws, tried by those states.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except it is still federally illegal so the FBI DEA can arrest and charge you. So far presidents have basicslly ignored it. But doesn’t mean a future administration well.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, that’s why Biden started the process of having them re-evaluate what it was scheduled as. But to make it legal, the legislative branch has to write the legislation.

          All the executive branch is supposed to do is execute legislation.

          Those orders being what is written by the peoples representatives (Congressmen and senators).

          Right now either:

          A: the majority of Americans don’t want marijuana legal and that’s why it’s illegal.

          B. The representatives are not representing what the people want.

          If the second one is true, it is our civic responsibility to vote those representatives out of office.

          https://www.businessinsider.com/3-republicans-legalize-marijuana-cannabis-2-democrats-vote-against-2022-4

          In 2020 and 2022 the decriminalization of it was voted on. If this is an issue you believe is misrepresented, every member of congress that voted against what you want you should want removed.

          Then we need to look at the Senate and vote against every member who voted against it as well.

          That’s how the peoples voices are supposed to be heard. Is it the best system, no. But it’s what we have and we don’t have enough people wanting to change it.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          How?

          The HHS is a deciding factor with set rules created by Congress. To change it would be invalid and blocked by any judge before going into effect. Destroying the credibility of what was occuring and killing it in its tracks when it could otherwise finish. Trump doesn’t want to stop that, neither does Kennedy (Pretty sure he’s for it)

  • FuryMaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Guessing weed business would boom, and government gain a tonne of tax, which Trump would take credit for.

    So no. Can’t see him doing it.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Entertainingly only really for the federal government. Of all the provinces only Alberta and PEI have broke even or made anymoney.

        Not saying there is not potential tax revenues, just that right now most provinces spend more then they collect for one (corruption) reason or another (needing to be seen being “tough” on drugs).

    • Thebular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re not calling for hi m to legalize it, the letter they wrote is asking him to reschedule it from a schedule 1 drug to a schedule 3 drug. Still can’t see him doing it.

  • 474D@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Isn’t it already ruled he has presidential immunity? Why isn’t he doing more? I understand he has some time but like… I hope there’s at least a “welcome package” for trump. I have no faith in anything anymore

    • _chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah. All faith in democrats wanting to do the BAREST MINIMUM to make a difference is flat out gone. Both sides apparently want the poor dead or in prison. Republicans are just gonna make it happen faster.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its only immune if the supreme court deems it an official act. This court will not give him the same leeway as they will Trump.

  • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    The time to do that really would have been before the election… He did reschedule it, but that can be undone day one. I honestly think the fascist voters would credit Trump. I’ve heard them say “already things are getting better” with no hint of irony.

      • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Damn you’re right, they did start the process, but the DEA pushed it back to 2025 after originally expecting it this year.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The DEA whose head Biden appointed decided to wait until the next president could block it?

          I wonder if Biden ran it by Joe Manchin or the senate parliamentarian first.

          • Starbuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            So your options were re-elect the team who are following the process but started late and put and end to federal prosecutions while he was in office, or re-elect the guy whose last AG was 100% against any reform attempts and actively prosecuted offenders.

            But no, go ahead and tell me how Trump was the better option here. This is why the republicans win. Everything on the left is a purity test where we endlessly belittle our politicians for not delivering everything all at once on day one, while the right makes plans that span decades to take power. Look at the Federalist Society. It took them decades to arrange for the moment where they would have decisive control over the judicial branch so they could crime with impunity. But tell me how Biden not completing a five year process in four years was too slow.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              or re-elect the guy whose last AG was 100% against any reform attempts and actively prosecuted offenders.

              Um… Harris jailed loads of people, and opposed reform efforts too. For weed.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              So your options were re-elect the team who are following the process but started late and put and end to federal prosecutions while he was in office, or re-elect the guy whose last AG was 100% against any reform attempts and actively prosecuted offenders.

              My options were Harris and Trump. I voted for Harris.

              But no, go ahead and tell me how Trump was the better option here.

              He wasn’t.

              Criticism of Biden isn’t advocacy for Trump. NEITHER OF THEM IS EVEN RUNNING. THE ELECTION IS OVER. But since centrists can’t defend their constant deliberate uselessness at anything other than arming a genocide, they have to pretend that any and all criticism of Drug War Biden is Trump support.

              You don’t have to carry water for him anymore. It’s over.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Maybe Democrats should have their own Federalist Society then. They’re the ones running the party and if they can’t implement the sort of multi-decade program that it takes to produce real change then maybe they’re shit at their jobs.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                Their jobs are to prevent real change, not implement it. They’re fantastic at their jobs.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I worry that they’ll just open a can of worms and fuck up our farm bill access.

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Democrats, the reason we lost is that we didn’t singularly campaign to Republicans in Detroit. That is the only deciding vote. 20 Republicans in Detroit. In 2028 it is TANTAMOUNT that we knock on 1 Republican door in Pennsylvania and 15 doors in Detroit.

  • BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anything that will be done can be undone. It doesn’t matter if he legalizes it federally, that shits going back to full ban day one

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dems really somehow let the Republicans become the anti establishment party in less than 20 years after GW, while run an idiot who failed upwards because of inherited wealth…

        I kept saying the last three elections were like Brewster’s Millions, but as much money as the wealthy throw at both parties, it might be time to question if they’re just paying the Dems to lose. And even when they do manage to win, it’s at best Joe Biden.

        Not even saying the DNC is being paid to take a fall. Just that the donors throwing crazy money at primaries know that the neoliberal doesn’t have a chance in the general.

        They just don’t want anyone that will fix shit getting close to a general election. So they make sure the Dem in the general is one the vast majority of Dem voters hate.

      • Irremarkable@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That doesn’t much matter when the psychotic theocrats are going to be the ones in the positions of power

    • Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I disagree. Ultimately, republicans want 3 things: money, power, and exclusivity. If they can somehow make tons of money off marijuana when no one else can, they would be all for it. Basically they perpetually want Rules for Thee Not for Me.

      So maybe they would revert it, but if they could find a way to make it theirs only, they would.

      • Tower@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        It would have to generate more money than the associated prison sentences generate, and the value of slave labor is about to skyrocket.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If they can somehow make tons of money off marijuana when no one else can, they would be all for it

        That’s in fact precisely what John “crying orange leather face” Boehner did

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Anything that will be done can be undone

      trump cant recharge pardoned people. And he cant recreate purged and deleted records. He also cant retake equipment thats been given to partners on a 4 year lease.