• paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a catch when your perspective is hoping it will impact the negatives of the jewelry industry.

      • Almrond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The problem wouldn’t be fixed even then. The jewelery companies have people convinced that the only diamonds that are worth it are mined from the earth by a real human slave. Fixing that problem has nothing to do with gemstones.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          companies have people convinced that the only diamonds that are worth it are mined from the earth by a real human slave

          Is this still the case? I feel like I’ve seen “conflict free” as a selling point for (presumably labgrown) diamonds.

          • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Me too. I’ve also heard synthetic gemstones can have colours and structures unlike anything that can form naturally. I want one of those, so that nobody would mistake it for a mined stone.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Will never happen until De beers exits the stage or is forced to.

        We already have incredibly easy to make and cheap diamonds that can rival and surpass any natural sized ones.

        They do not sell nearly as well because De beers has convinced everyone natural diamonds are a scarce resource, while they have a monopoly on the supply, of which there is no actual scarcity.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          and surpass any natural sized ones

          What’s the biggest synthetic diamond we’ve made so far? Has anyone made diamond spectacles or windows?

            • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              10mm diameter

              Ah, so still not quite Cullinan-scale yet. Optical quality is probably better though.

              I’m surprised diamonds aren’t used more for lenses. Given its high index of refraction, it seems like an ideal material.

              • Blackmist
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah, the optical quality seems to be the main point. I assume there’s few fields where that level of precision is worth it though. I doubt we’re about to see it on an iPhone any time soon.