• trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Arch really does have the most straightforward packaging system. Can you write a Bash script? Cool. You can package your application for Arch very easily.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately, from my testing back when I used Arch, a lot of packages in the AUR didn’t meet packaging guidelines, so while quickly writing a PKGBUILD is easy, writing it correctly requires a bit more effort, especially regarding the dependencies. IIRC namcap is often enough, but ideally packages should be built in clean chroots as well to make sure they build everywhere

    • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, while lots of people have plenty of other reasons for using Arch. The packaging system is my personal favorite. I have made packages for deb and rpm based systems before, but Arch is just so dead simple with little scripts preinstalled to make it even easier.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Absolutely agree, the wholeapt-get upgrade (or however, I always messed it up!) was annoying to me, and I switched to an arch distro (Endeavour) and I’m super happy with it. It’s my only machine and it is awesome

        • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Technically yes, but practically no. For the same reasons that manjaro might struggle with the aur even though it is technically arch based.

    • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      David might be using git’s send email, which he likely has set up to have a max line length of about 80, because that’s what the kernel developers require.

      • smeg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is it? What email client can’t do any kind of soft word-wrapping?