• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Well the difference is that while both actively premeditated their murders whoever committed the crimes Mangioni has been accused of is far more of a menace because they had a specific target in mind and even worse it was someone rich instead of just anyone protesting the police tendency to murder.

    • prayer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Rittenhouse attacked 3 people, that’s 3x the danger. But I guess I forgot to count up their net worths.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sure he was attacked in the same way you attack a burglar. He shouldve been hanged for waving that fucken rifle around outside of his hometown let alone in a different state. But such mistakes can always be corrected.

          • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            52 minutes ago

            oh ffs. you are clearly unaware of how laws work in the particular states where this occurred, and are trying to staple vaguely European or Canadian laws on to the situation, mostly which are considered pretty fascist by those under them.

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You don’t straw buy an AR then pick it up and cross state lines with it going to a known chaotic protest without premeditated “self defence”.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Carrying a gun is “premeditated self defence”? Are people only supposed to carry guns where it is safe? What is the purpose of that?

          So many people pushing this ridiculous idea he is guilty for not staying at home, quaking in his boots. Right to self defense and to bear arms literally exist so that people don’t have to fear walking outside because of asshat violent criminals and rioters.

          And even more ridiculous saying the police and prosecutors didn’t care. What do you mean? They went after him with everything they had. It was a jury of his peers that told them to f off with that shit.

          But I guess lemmy only likes juries if they nullify actual murderers they like, not when they let go an innocent person they don’t like. (I don’t like Rittenhouse either, but that does not make him a murderer.)

        • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah and you don’t get acquitted of that either. Also one of the surviving “victims” doesn’t blow the prosecution’s case by being honest in your scenario. That look of defeat photo is priceless.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        He deliberately brandished a weapon to incite bystanders to try to defend themselves so he could kill them and call it self defense.

        • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “Brandishing” a weapon isn’t a crime in Wisconsin. Even if it were, it wouldn’t justify vigilantes attempting to kill him.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        He absolutely did though, the whole point was he wanted to get into a fight be “forced” to defend himself.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            He was literally filmed that night watching Antifa Members leave a CVS, where he said “If only I had my gun on me right now”

            He was also in an interview with a militia group bragging about “Never using non-lethal”

            He also had various facebook posts where he talked about wanting to kill.

            He also had a history of schoolyard violence against young girls.

            These were disallowed from being admitted as evidence by the judge who claimed these were “irrelevant”, even though they clearly paint a motive.

            There’s also the fact that you don’t travel across state lines with an illegal weapon because you love somebody else’s property that much. He had claimed he had been “Hired to protect a dealership” and that he was “Only there to provide medical assistance with the gun being purely for protection”, at one point he’d even been asked to leave by police who only allowed him to stay because he lied about being a “Trained EMT”

            Which resulted in the (often played out of context) clip of the police saying “We appreciate you guys, we really do!” as they gave him bottles of water. (Yet no charges for lying to law enforcement, self-misrepresentation, or “Stolen Valor”, curious)

            The fact that he wore gloves at all times while handling the weapon also shows he intended to use it for criminal purposes and took steps to hide his fingerprints.

            The evidence of pre-mediation is overwhelming, had the Judge not been a MAGA-Plant and the Prosecution not been incompetent “DID THE VIDEO GAMES MAKE YOU DO IT KYLE?!!?!”

            It’s pretty obvious how this would have gone

          • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            let’s just leave rittenhouse out of this. he got away, whatever.

            it is divisive, focus on the topic at hand. Luigi likely did not do it and health insurance it trash that must be reformed.

            • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Luigi likely did not do it and health insurance it trash that must be reformed.

              Ah you’re right, I think that’s what matters more too. This is going to be one hell of a trial.

              • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                If the Judge were to ask me, I’d say pretty sure Luigi didn’t do it, I thought I saw Nancy Mace with the glock though.

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t think other commenters bothered to watch the trial.

        He was acting foolish but he certainly didn’t commit pre-meditated murder.