• ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝MA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      That’s interesting:

      (f) A person who possesses six or more obscene devices or identical or similar obscene articles is presumed to possess them with intent to promote the same.

      So it’s not just 6 obscene devices, you could have two Rampant Rabbits and break the law. I assume a double-ended dildo counts as one obscene device unless they can be disengaged to make two identical ones.

      “Obscene devices” is rather a loose term too. The kinky are likely to have quite a few knocking about but for personal use only.

      • pemptago@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        They define them in 43.21(7), albeit, still quite loosely:

        (7) “Obscene device” means a device including a dildo or artificial vagina, designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.

        So maybe a devices like the magic wand is in the clear since it’s marketed as a massager. I wonder if a vibrator could simply be repackaged and marketed as a massager, as well.

        • maniii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          Possession with Intent to Distribute ?

          I mean is a weapon of Mass Distraction ?

          What is this law ???

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝MA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          They often are.

          Interestingly, it doesn’t include butt plugs - Republicans must love those, also penis cages and cock rings.

      • adavis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        For the double, if it counts as two when split it’d be illegal because two identical devices