• Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    K. I’m going to get back to work for my company that is mass murdering children by lowering employee reproductive health. (/s)

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Your taxes may also go towards murdering kids, whether it be state funded abortions or bombing Gaza

      • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Those two examples are wildly different from eachother. One is a medical procedure involving theoretical children, and the other has real kids getting injured and killed.

        Edit: wanted to add that the medical procedure is always to prevent a major health issue when being funded by state taxes.

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Whenever the israelis bomb the buildings, they don’t know for certain there are kids in there. They are just theoretical kids in the moment to them.

          • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            More like, Schrodinger’s kids. I genuinely hope you find peace and learn to not let being pro-birth justify letting others suffer and/or die. Red tape and bans kill when it comes to healthcare, without solving anything.

            • Flax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              15 hours ago

              A successful abortion always has at least a 100% fatality rate.

              • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Why does that matter? If the fetus cannot survive outside the womb due to genetic defects, why would I care about that when I could care about the health of the mother?

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Oh, so the mother’s die every time?

                Even under your bad definition it’d be only 50-60% (accounting for the fact that some mothers do die)

                • Flax
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  That’ll make it 200% if they did

                  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    You can’t have a higher than 100% death rate, that means more people died than were involved in what happened

                    By reasonable definition that’s 1 death: the mother

                    By your own poor definition it’s 2: mother and fetus

                    So where are we getting extra from?