• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    1 and 2 are about even. 3 is a little lower than them, but not by much.

    The first two really are parts 1 and 2 of a story. The 3rd completely changes the scenery, which gives some people the impression it’s not as good. It is though , and it ends the story well.

    Then there’s the fun fact that parts 2 and 3 were filmed at the same time. So the impression the films give is backwards from how they were made.

    • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve always preferred 3 over 2, even as a kid. The future stuff and the alternate 1985 are fun, but the third act feels like such a retread of the first one, especially in a marathon situation.