• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    something being labeled a “disorder” doesn’t mean it’s “bad,” it just means it’s different from average

    That’s until you start talking about “treatment”, at which point you’re discussing how to mitigate or correct the “disorder”.

    And that gets you to Conversation Therapy, which is just medicalized torture.

    The end game of “Transgenderism is a disorder” amounts to Gitmo for Trans People.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Conversation Therapy

      Ironically, this typo is exactly the therapy LGBTQ+ people need, and probably the therapy that works least well for people on the autism spectrum.

      There are a lot of treatments available. For LGBTQ+, the best treatment is probably social acceptance, followed closely by body modification. For people on the autism spectrum, it’s finding a lifestyle that plays to their strengths rather than expects them to conform to whatever is “normal.”

      The problem isn’t with definitions, but intolerance. Certain groups refuse to acknowledge that there’s more than one way to solve a given problem, and that more effective and compassionate solutions are valid. If we assume that, for example, homosexuality is a “disorder,” two possible treatments are:

      • remove the gay
      • embrace the gay

      I’m not even sure the first is possible, but the second is absolutely effective. Why default to the harder, unproven option when the second is so effective? The problem here isn’t definitions, but intolerance, but unfortunately tolerance is much harder achieve and changing words is relatively easy.