Comic book writer and producer Marc Bernardin has posted on Blue Sky about the future of the comic book adaptation of Neil Gaiman’s Anansi Boys. Bernadin adapted the series from Neil Gaiman’s original novel, drawn by Shaun Martinborough, and published by Dark Horse Comics. It is one of a number of such titles from the publisher that have adapted some of Neil Gaiman’s adult fantasy works, including American Gods and Norse Mythology.

The last page of Anansi Boys #7 advertised a new issue #8 for February, but this will no longer be published. In recent months, Tortoise Media, NY Magazine, and Vulture have reported detailed allegations of abuse by a number of women against Gaiman. Gaiman has denied anything non-consensual.

Bernadin wrote with the accompanying visual from above, “Last week, Anansi Boys 7 hit stands. It will be the last issue. Dark Horse will not release a trade. I am incredibly proud of the work we did on the book. @smartinbrough.bsky.social 's lines were fantastic, @sotocolor.bsky.social 's hues were extraordinary, @david-mack.bsky.social slayed the covers. But all of that pales. Anansi Boys is about two brothers, twins. One is meek, timid, like a flopsy, set-upon puppy. The other brother is narcissistic, hedonistic, governed by nothing other than his own pursuit of sensation and pleasure. They seem so different, but they are very much flip sides of the same coin. Literally. I never gave too much thought about that. Until now. My heart breaks for the survivors and any pain seeing these books on the shelves might have caused.”

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Feel bad for the folks who adapted it and are now getting screwed cuz of Gaiman.

  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Goddammit, I gotta try and cancel my Kickstarter pledge for the Good Omens graphic novel

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      23 hours ago

      There’s £2.5m invested in that and cancelling isn’t an option and is going to harm Colleen Doran and the Pratchett estate.

      However, people have been backing out and there have been no quibbles about it.

  • Meeshall65@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This cancelling of people, i can understand. The cancelling of art made by those people is beyond me. Will we destroy the Mona Lisa if we should find evidence that Leonardo was a sexual predator?

    • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Canceling future stuff and destroying existing stuff are not the same, you can tell because they use different words.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I mean, if the story has a planned ending and you’ve destroyed any chance of that planned ending ever happening - you’ve effectively destroyed the existing media. I don’t really see the difference between the two in this instance.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          So, are all the shows that are canceled without an ending also destroyed? Cuz I mean most of those aren’t even canceled for a reason, like this is (other than money).

          Sure, they aren’t story-complete, but they aren’t gone, they are still available to consume, as are the first 7 releases of this series.

          Just treat it like a cliffhanger. Lots of stories end that way on purpose.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Difference between art which already exists and art which is being created. No one is saying to destroy what Gaiman has already made. They simply said they aren’t supporting his creation of more art on account of him being an asshole.