I’ve been using skiff. com for sometime, as they claim to be a fully privacy preserving app suite like GApps or proton. One thing I like is they provide 10GB storage even for free accounts, where proton eventhough much bigger provides only 500MB.

But that got me wondering… Are they trustworthy as proton? Is there a chanve they end up being a honeypot? Does data actually gets encrypted before sending to the servers in a trustworthy way?

    • fbsz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Skiff licensed all of it’s apps it at CC-BY-NC-4, why not change it for GPL 3.0 to make it a real free and open source software that respects user’s freedom and mandates the fork to be free and open source. There’s a difference between free software, open source and source available!

      • obosob
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I presume the reason they didn’t use GPL3 is because they wanted the attribution and non-commercial clauses offered by CC-BY-NC.

        Not suggesting that they should not prefer to drop those clauses in favour of a copyleft free software licence. but you asked “why not” and losing those clauses is clearly an obvious candidate for why they might not want to.

        • fbsz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A software using CC-BY-NC-4 is not a good option, as it was made for media. If skiff markets itself as open source, it should respect the guidelines of opensource( it’s open source(https://opensource.org/osd/), you can read the 6th rule. It says the software should not be limited for commercial use.)

          • obosob
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree, I’m just answering the why question. Free software licenses don’t have non-commercial clauses and they want an NC clause.