I ran my old 2004 Samsung television into the ground: the EL backlight was so worn out that the picture had large dark holes in it, and the TV would take 20 minutes to warm up and display something.

And today it wouldn’t start at all anymore. It’s deader than a dead dodo. But hey, 20 years for a modern TV ain’t bad. I’m pretty pleased with that.

So I went to the supermarket to find the cheapest set I could find. I asked the salesman if they had a cheap, but most importantly NON-SMART TV - thinking non-smart TVs are probably the cheapest of them all, if they still existed at all.

The man said “We have this dumb 43” TV here, but it’s the last one, and then we won’t get anymore dumb TVs for 3 months."

I looked at the price and it was - gasp - $20 MORE than the cheapest Android-encumbered smart TV of the same size.

I asked the man how come and he said “Well, dumb TVs are hard to get and they sell almost immediately. So they’re worth more than the smart ones.”

Wow. So people actually WANT dumb TVs and are willing to pay a premium for em. It means attitudes towards the value of privacy are changing and that’s great!

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I asked the man how come and he said “Well, dumb TVs are hard to get and they sell almost immediately. So they’re worth more than the smart ones.”

    He’s wrong. They’re cheaper because the manufacturer makes money off selling advertisements.

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I suspect the vast majority of people are buying dumb TVs because android TV sucks, not for privacy reasons. I’m willing to bet most go home and plug their Chromecast or FireTV stick right in.

    So as long as android TV sucks, its good news for us.

    • Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I dunno that’s entirely accurate - we have a Sony Bravia android TV (working on moving away from default OS but that’s another story) that is perfectly usable with Stremio and Jellyfin and doesn’t have massive invasive ads. One of my parents has a dumb TV with a Chromecast and it’s nothing but a PITA to use by comparison.

    • Schorsch@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      “subsidized” – TVs sold perfectly well before they were flooded with ads. Ads and selling user data just mean more money for CEOs. Always more, MORE, MOOORE PROFIT!

        • Professorozone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’ve always wanted to ask a billionaire how much was enough, but I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t understand the question. Enough? What’s that?

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s why I deny the parasite engagement and profit, every chance I get 🐸

          We got a class war on our hands, normies are just oblivious

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Neither are all but the cheapest smart TVs.

      It’s called double and triple dipping. Every single company that can get away with double, triple, quadruple dipping can and does.

      Buying the initial product + Subscription + selling your data + dropping support to force you to buy a new product is quite commonplace. The old mantra of “if you are not paying, you are the product” doesn’t apply anymore because most companies do both.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Simple solution: buy a smart TV and never connect it to the internet.

    • fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Many smart TVs still give you popups telling you to connect to the internet or they simply refuse work without connection. There’s not a very good way to tell if any smart TV you get will do this ahead of time without looking over reviews, and even then many people just connect their TVs anyway so it might not show up there either.

      I’d prefer to just have a display that works as a display from the start and not have to worry about it.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Often it will yell at you every day and be very intrusive, not actually disconnect from the internet and force join any old WiFi connections/any non-password protected ones, or simply refuse to work unless you connect them (I think some people were saying newer Samsung TVs do that)

      • oldfart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I got a Sharp Android smart tv last year when my 2006 Samsung died and it works great without internet access. Cheapest one there was.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you are not able to find a dumb TV, I recommend Google based TVs (GTVs). Unlike some Roku based TVs, GTVs will boot and work just fine even if you never configure their network access. If you do opt to enable network access on a GTV, you can set up static IP addresses on them, including PiHole as DNS.

    My wife likes the convenience of a smart TV in her office so I DMZ’d it so that it has no access to our home network and it goes through a dedicated PiHole on a Pi Zero. Neither the Roku or LG TVs we had allowed for this, so I sold the RokuTV and I connected the LG to a thin client with a Bluetooth remote.

    PS: Hisense makes a great 4K TV that goes to shit the moment you connect it to the network because of inadequate computing power, low memory, and bad code (memory leaks). If you don’t connect it to a network and use it as a dumb TV, it is great display for very little money.

  • Extras@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hit up thrift stores they always have a pile in decent shape. Just test them at an outlet

  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This won’t work if you use actual, classic TV. But I researched for a fair while and found none of the dumb TVs are cheaper than low end smart TVs. Not by a long shot. So I got a giant computer screen instead. I just connect my switch or my laptop.

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Just an FYI that the Smart cancer has already began infecting computer monitors. It won’t be long until there are no more dumb monitors.

      Samsung and LG make smart computer monitors. There are probably many others.