• IbnLemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Right, right, because it’s people on welfare that are destroying the economy… Tory logic

  • SbisasCostlyTurnover
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s like 15 people in this country who could be looking for work and aren’t. How does inflicting revenge pain on them raise any sort of money for the rest of us?

    They’re either lying, or utterly incompetent when it comes to understanding who’s in the welfare system.

    Or both I guess.

    • Big P
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They understand what their voters want to hear: it’s not us causing the problem in this country, it’s the lazy benefit cheats

      • SbisasCostlyTurnover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’ve come full circle on this one. This is pretty much exactly the same shit they said 13 years ago when we all had to ‘tighten our budgets’ whilst the richest people in the UK got significantly richer at our expense.

      • SbisasCostlyTurnover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mate I work a minimum wage warehouse job and my partner works part time in a supermarket. We rent a 2 bed terrace house that hasn’t had any work done to it in 20 years and can barely afford to keep the lights on. Middle class I ain’t.

          • SbisasCostlyTurnover
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            But in the grand scheme of things it’s a relatively small percentage of people. And If they were serious about saving the tax payers money they wouldn’t have written off a few billion in COVID loans a few years back.

            They couldn’t give two shits if some bloke is down the job center claiming a few hundred quid to sit on his arse, and tbh neither should we. There’s significantly bigger fish to fry.

              • SbisasCostlyTurnover
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                When did I say people aren’t playing the system? I said it’s massively overestimated given the numbers of people that aren’t playing the system.

                And welfare spending also includes Pensions. It’s also by far and away the largest portion of that pie. Maybe we could take the state pension away from people who already have a nice cushty private pension and distribute that percentage back to people who aren’t in a position to retire at all?

      • mackwinston
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The OP is clearly using hyperbole. But only 1% of the welfare bill goes on unemployment benefits, so even if absolutely everyone on unemployment benefits is cheating and you cut them off, you don’t save much. In reality the majority of people on unemployment benefits are not cheating the system - a system that already sanctions the unemployed for not actively seeking work.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m talking about the long term “sick” many of whom I personally believe are exaggerating their symptoms.

            Well good thing you know what your talking about. Otherwise I’d be inclined think you were a enormous twat.

    • HandsomeDevil@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’d be surprised to find out that it’s way more than 15 people. I’ve personally known at least a dozen who immigrated to the UK just because of the welfare system and they’d abuse it by getting paid for sitting on their ass all day.

      • snipvoid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You absolutely do not.

        I was an audiotypist for benefit fraud interviews for many years. My partner at the time worked in the BDC. I’m also a first generation immigrant. What I’m trying to say is that you absolutely are talking out your arse.

        I can assure you that even if anyone immigrates to the UK, the road between stepping foot in the country and being able to claim benefits is long and complex.

        Why would you even lie?

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of EU migrants have easy access to benefits. And people from Eastern Europe know how to live frugally (source: I’m one of them). Living on benefits in the UK is easy, benefits are bigger than average salaries in many Eastern European countries, housing is also covered, so you’re getting shit loads of money doing absolutely nothing. I know a person from my country, who migrated to the UK, got furloughed during the pandemic, then spent some time on UC while constantly travelling across Europe for fun, now she bought a flat in her home country and moved back. Buying a flat while living on benefits, isn’t that a dream?

          The benefits system in the UK is ridiculous. It doesn’t help those in need, but allows a lot of people to defraud the system and milk it for cash.

          • snipvoid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Truly amazing. You’re doubling down.

            Tell me ‘fellow migrant’, what length of time must you have been living in the UK, on what terms of immigration, and what stipulations must be fulfilled before a claim can be made (that will be processed and NOT automatically declined) by the Department for Work and Pensions.

            If someone was furloughed, then they weren’t on UC. Also, I had to travel back to my home country during the pandemic because my mother died from covid and I’m an only child. I had been claiming UC at the time and my benefits were stopped while I was there because I left the country for more than 30 days.

            The more you carry on with this lie, the more evident it is that you have zero idea what you’re talking about.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only one lying here is you, mate. You didn’t even read my comment properly, there’s nothing to discuss here.

              • snipvoid@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                A stupendous attempt to save face.

                I am completely open to debate your claims factually. However, it looks like the facts don’t support your little narrative. So it’s probably a good idea for you to throw in the towel now.

      • SbisasCostlyTurnover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean I’ll happily have a debate about the merits of UBI in a world where we’re rushing towards mass unemployment, but that’s aside it’s a very very small segment of people on welfare who are “playing the system”.

        It’s bullshit rhetoric designed to get people shouting down at the poorest in our society whilst the richest get away with stealing from us all.

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          UBI changes the game too though as you don’t lose if if you are working. Its always there so you don’t have to navigate a beurocratic process instead of being able to look for work.

          • fakeman_pretendname
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plenty would happily work “a bit” or “in some way”, but there’s not a lot in the system to support assisted/flexible/partial working etc.

            If you have injuries, ailments, illnesses, they’re still asking you to work 40 hours or go fully on sick, rather than supporting a “however many hours you can manage” and a small topup to maintain a basic standard of living.

            These used to be part of the system, in the earlier part of the “working tax credits” era.

              • fakeman_pretendname
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry to hear that - and I don’t doubt they exist, but i don’t think it’s in the numbers that sometimes get portrayed, more in “statistically irrelevant” sort of numbers - though it will depend vastly on where you live in the country. I’m sure it’s a visible problem in some specific areas or communities.

                However, I also think people (and the job centre) should be picky about the work people are applying for, at least for a while. This was also formerly part of the system, where they pretty much gave you a year of looking for relevant work, before enforcing other options.

                When someone better qualified (like when a large employer in an area suddenly closes) is forced to do an entry level job, especially through one of those “supporting you back to work” scams, where you work 40 hours in exchange for your dole & landlord benefit (i.e. working for ~£3 an hour) - you’re blocking all the entry level work from people who can currently only apply to it.

                Personally, I’d rather let the handful of gleeful scroungers skip joyously down the road with their £70 in hand and do nothing, than punish millions of genuinely struggling people “just in case”.

              • wildeaboutoskar
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’ve brought your father up a couple of times in this thread. It feels like you’re projecting a bit.

                I get having a shit dad, but not everyone is the same

      • SbisasCostlyTurnover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        This may come as a shock…but the 15 wasn’t meant to be taken literally.

        I know right.

  • fakeman_pretendname
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jeremy Hunt: “A “poor” asked me for some change or a warm drink the other day. Obviously I wanted to help him, so I punched him in the face and stole his rucksack and blanket, which will support and encourage him back into the world of work.”

  • Mrkawfee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Replaying Cameron and Osborne’s greatest austerity hits.

  • Syldon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tory MPs must be crapping themselves.

  • LifeBandit666
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where’s the package to save us from corporate welfare Mr Cunt. Bail out any banks recently? Fuck off

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes

      It’s a great bogeyman they can spend money going after because the people who they’ll screw over (ie those who will lose their home if they start working as minimum wage is too low and support is only given to people who earn below a certain amount which is way too little) would never vote for them anyway

    • Jimbo@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, election year in New Zealand too and National are doing the exact same thing… I’m so tired of this boogeyman, I don’t know how other people aren’t just as tired of this bullshit.

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It continues to disturb me that this is so popular. Hurting the most vulnerable in our society for votes is pretty sick and twisted.

  • MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s an election year even if its not been announced the tories are doing their favourite thing of targeting a minority within a majority

  • Kofu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, get a job like us cause, we do fuck all and get paid too.

    • coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anecdotal evidence is not stronger than actual data. Your father became reliant on the state because the state paid a living wage and other jobs didn’t.

        • coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Social programs don’t go far enough. You can’t lift yourself out of poverty when you’re paid before the poverty line. People who need these resources can’t afford to lift themselves out of poverty.

            • coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You are protecting a lot of stereotypes into a very diverse set of people. You can’t police the few that would spend their money on heroine without punishing those who need food for themselves and their children. Stop blaming the poor for all of societies problems and start looking at the rich to pay their debt to society.

              There is no effort you can put into getting out of poverty because the system is designed to keep you impoverished.

                • coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not without creating a complex and expensive system that is unnecessarily penalizing.

                  You’re right, you didn’t mention the rich and that’s the problem. Your focus has been on the wrong group this entire time. Quit obsessing over the people with the least power to affect any change in they’re lives and start focusing on the group that never faces scrutiny but is most deserving of it.