That’s the thing. For as much nominal support the Arab world gives Palestine, there is absolutely nothing preventing Jordan and Egypt from welcoming in Palestinians.
Except that Palestinian militants conducted an attempted coup against Jordan in 1970, and Hamas routinely conducts terrorist attacks throughout the Sinai peninsula, so neither country actually wants to deal with them.
For decades, Arab countries played up the “plight of the Palestinians” not because they cared about those people, but because it distracted those countries’ citizens. It gave them an external enemy to hate (Israel) instead of asking questions about their own governments’ actions.
Jordon could have easily absorbed the Palestinians into their general population, but doing so would have removed a political pawn that Jordon could use against Israel. It was better for Jordon if the Palestinians were poor refugees living in squalor so that they could keep saying “look at what Israel did.”
NOTE: I’m not absolving Israel for any of its actions. I’m just adding to the discussion by pointing out that the Arab nations only cared about the Palestinians to advance their own goals. The second their goals didn’t align with the Palestinians’ well-being, they were happy to let the Palestinians suffer and die.
Are you suggesting that Jordan and Egypt don’t care about Palestinians because they don’t allow Israel to forcibly relocate millions of refugees to their countries? Beyond the fact it’s a war crime, it doesn’t really improve the situation for anyone but Israel.
The Gaza Strip literally was Egyptian territory. Hamas is a branch of the Egyptian Islamic Brotherhood. The Apartheid state as it exists is largely the fault of the two major attempts by neighboring countries to exterminate Israel and failing.
Egypt should care about the humanitarian crisis as it played a major part in starting it.
I agree with the second part of your statement. Egypt could do more. But I’m not understanding what the first part has to do with forced displacement to Egypt. Is that somehow justified by the history?
That’s the thing. For as much nominal support the Arab world gives Palestine, there is absolutely nothing preventing Jordan and Egypt from welcoming in Palestinians.
Except that Palestinian militants conducted an attempted coup against Jordan in 1970, and Hamas routinely conducts terrorist attacks throughout the Sinai peninsula, so neither country actually wants to deal with them.
For decades, Arab countries played up the “plight of the Palestinians” not because they cared about those people, but because it distracted those countries’ citizens. It gave them an external enemy to hate (Israel) instead of asking questions about their own governments’ actions.
Jordon could have easily absorbed the Palestinians into their general population, but doing so would have removed a political pawn that Jordon could use against Israel. It was better for Jordon if the Palestinians were poor refugees living in squalor so that they could keep saying “look at what Israel did.”
NOTE: I’m not absolving Israel for any of its actions. I’m just adding to the discussion by pointing out that the Arab nations only cared about the Palestinians to advance their own goals. The second their goals didn’t align with the Palestinians’ well-being, they were happy to let the Palestinians suffer and die.
Are you suggesting that Jordan and Egypt don’t care about Palestinians because they don’t allow Israel to forcibly relocate millions of refugees to their countries? Beyond the fact it’s a war crime, it doesn’t really improve the situation for anyone but Israel.
The Gaza Strip literally was Egyptian territory. Hamas is a branch of the Egyptian Islamic Brotherhood. The Apartheid state as it exists is largely the fault of the two major attempts by neighboring countries to exterminate Israel and failing.
Egypt should care about the humanitarian crisis as it played a major part in starting it.
I agree with the second part of your statement. Egypt could do more. But I’m not understanding what the first part has to do with forced displacement to Egypt. Is that somehow justified by the history?