• yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not necessarily. The majority of current US was colonised long after it became an independent state.

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d argue the majority of English-based naming though are in the original 13 colonies and were named prior to 1776. Having lived on both coasts, it sure seems that is the case.

        A lot of the other places are likely due to later immigrants building their own communities west of those colonies, and then there are a lot of coincidences as well.

        And then there’s a ton of cities named after Bible references.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve lived in the Midwest, and after moving to New England, this it very much the case. Most of the 4-5 states that make up New England are full of towns with the same names from old England used over and over.

          But in the plus side we don’t sound like idiots when we visit and know how to pronounce Gloucester and Worcester.

          French Canadians in New England did the opposite though, and seem to aggressively mispronounce their French locations (Calais, Barre, Montpelier).

      • Auk@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a Bagdad in Tasmania too, went past it when I was down there a while back (as well as Jericho and the Nile River).

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Supposedly that city is named after a dad who ran a mining operation loading stuff out in bags. Ridiculous.

        There’s also a Bagdad in Florida.

        • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve heard that but I highly doubt it. seems like a post 9/11 freedom fries kinda deal. When I was a kid I remember hearing that they named it that way because the founder had been to Baghdad and thought it the most beautiful desert city in the world, so he wanted to invoke that spirit. Doubt the spelling was nearly as standardized back then.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    York isn’t just a city in England, it’s also a city in Pennsylvania.

    Also, the existence of New Caledonia and New Britain tells me it’s not just Americans doing this.

    • abaci@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t believe those Americans, capturing New Netherland from the Dutch and renaming it in honor of the Duke of York. Just like an American to do that

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe there’s also a New London, pop 15 plus someone’s dog, which shows a distinct lack of imagination.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We even do it to ourselves

    Indigenous PNWers call white folks bostoners because of how many of them originally came from Mass and named their new settlements after towns in Mass

  • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live in New England, USA. I was talking with a Brit about the British show The Archers. The Brit asked me whether I could tell which places were made up for the show and which were real. I told him that if I new a place in New England named something, it was probably a real place in the UK.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even old New York was once New Amsterdam

      Why they changed it I can’t say

      People just liked it better that way

      • domin8r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Dutch “lost” New York to the English. They surrendered when a large force of Englishmen demanded the surrender of the city. It had been awarded to the Duke of York. Hence the name.