• Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think this was a smart Move to mix these two issues. Israel & Palestine are so extremely polarizing and mixing this with climate might divide the People and weaken the fight for a green future. For example I would rather avoid that topic. I don’t know enough about Palestine/Israel to publicly debate it. And if my climate-rally somehow turns to pro Palestine or pro Israel I would rather abstain from visiting it. Because I dont have a solid View on this topic. And I think I might not be alone with this feeling.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      and people told MLK Jr. similar things when he spoke out against the Vietnam War. Activists fundamentally fight for justice, and as King said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” It might make sense in the short term to look the other way and conform, but when something so terrible happens due to actions from a western ally, it’s good in the long term to have principles.

    • Blackmist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the far left and far right have a similar problem here, in that you have to be “all in” on the group’s talking points, for danger of being ostracised by your peers.

    • Nevoic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Activists don’t need to be one-track minded. They rarely are. I’m a vegan, socialist, anti-fascist who is against the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and for climate justice globally. There’s very strong overlap in these positions. There’s a reason you won’t find a lot of Republican vegans, or pro-Israel socialists.

      Yes, sometimes people don’t put in the time to investigate these issues, and I commend you for knowing the limits of your own knowledge, I’ve recommended to people before that it’s better to just say “I don’t know enough about this issue” instead of arriving at an under-researched position. However, it’s not necessary to criticize people who are actually activists, learn about these issues, and go out into the world and advocate for change, so long as they’re advocating for the right thing.

      The topic being brought up might ostracize people, but it will also put the topic into people’s minds. People like you might not know what the correct position is here, but you hear the constant pro-Israel propaganda pumped out by the U.S and might arrive at a subconscious conclusion that aligns with the imperial core.

      If you hear people speaking out against the apartheid state of Israel, especially people who align with your values, you might be inclined to look into it more, or at the very least not automatically accept U.S propaganda on the issue.

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have to disagree, the activists that really get things done do have a one-track mind, because it takes a lot of energy, money, and time to make any progress in just one issue. You can certainly care about many things, but you can’t go to every conference, cover every issue in your speech, raise money for every cause, etc.

      • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Again. It creates divergence and weakens the awareness for the core Issue of this specific rally and might drive people away from it.

        EDIT: Btw. it’s pretty bold of you to assume you know what “the right thing” is especially on such an highly complex and diverse topic like Israel/Gaza.

        • SubtleEvolution@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not bold to declare apartheid a horrible injustice. The commenter above isn’t claiming perfect knowledge or even prescribing a solution, they’re condemning an atrocity.

      • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what they mean when they say that the left will eat it’s own. Some of them share this view and they don’t want to seek consensus on topics we agree to advance their goals. Instead they demand that others support all their beliefs.

    • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      We need to have clean air and water to see the burning of the cities we have genocide in, we need to make a better world to kill other because of where they were born and what sky God they choose.

    • dzire187@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think this was a smart Move.

      So, according to you it wasn’t a smart move to grab the mic, and basically say what you’re saying in this comment?

      Did you, by any chance, not read beyond the headline?