• snaprails
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Pretty sure that’s not an “historic low”. In 1642 it was at least 50% and that went soooo well, didn’t it? The monarchy is not the cause of this country’s current ills, most people agree it’s not important so why bother with the hassle of changing it, whatever you replace it with will almost certainly be worse (just like last time). I realize that’s probably an unpopular opinion around here 🙂

    • rah
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Gracious and dignified in her obscene wealth and unelected, corrupt power.

        • rah
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It doesn’t. Another of 'em’s taken over the obscene wealth and unelected, corrupt power.