“A few years ago an idea materialized in my head for what would be really 28 Years Later,” Garland says, suggesting the next movie will skip the obvious “28 Months Later” naming convention and jump into the future. “Danny always liked the idea.”

In the two decades since 28 Days Later, Garland has also become a respected director in his own right. So who will direct this sequel? Danny Boyle has some ideas.

“So we’re talking about it quite seriously, quite diligently,” Boyle says. “If he doesn’t want to direct it himself I’ll be well up for it if we can execute a similarly good idea.”

“I resisted [making a sequel] for a long time because there were things about 28 Weeks that bugged me,” Garland says. “I just thought, ‘F*ck that. I’d rather try to write a different story in a different world.’”

But clearly, something changed. Maybe enough time has passed. Or maybe the decision to skip “28 Months Later” and jump straight to “28 Years” offers the opportunity to ignore the bad parts of 28 Weeks. Either way, we’re definitely not complaining — assuming all this talk actually leads to something, of course.

All sounds promising, although I hope they don’t plan on releasing it in 2030, which would be 28 years after the first film.

  • Mikelius@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    …2030, which would be 28 years after the first film

    Now I definitely feel the grim reaper watching me age, knowing that’s only 7 years away lol. Still remember when the movie first came out.

  • Tenebris Nox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    By 2030, it’d probably be a streaming tv series the way that cinema’s going.

    I’d like to see a sequel but not directed by Boyle. He’s gone of the boil (groan!) as a a film-maker imo. Garland directed Devs competently but I’m not sure whether he’s got a good eye for the visceral, fast-paced horror that 28 Years Later would need.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not really sure either of them have and it’ll be a slower, more meditative take on people trying to rebuild after an apocalypse.

      I think we’d need to look elsewhere if we want a fast-paced, visceral post-apocalyptic zombie movie. The Sadness or the Crossed film that disappeared off the radar.

      • Tenebris Nox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A Crossed movie!

        You’ve made me just realise that this is something I’d kill to see.

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPMA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it was announced in 2010 and they got the rights back in 2012, then… silence.

          I suspect the issue is balancing the budget and the certification. That said, a lot more R-rated films have been well recently so it could open the door. Also The Sadness has been well-received and I imagine someone has floated the idea of an English-language remake when the comics are just waiting to be adapted.

  • lypticdna
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am a huge fan of anything post-apocalytic (I mean, my handle of lypticdna is based on the love of apocalyptic things). 28 Days Later was such an underrated film I think, or at least I appreciated it way more than most people I knew. 28 Weeks Later was OK and a good continuation but hard to beat the original imo.

    The thought of 28 Years Later is interesting. You do not find many post-post-apocalyptic movies (if any… thinks… hmm, not sute) but this would be a great opportunity to do one. I would definately want to see it but agree with other comments… would it be a ‘rebuilding after the apocalyse style’ and would that work but also is Boyle the right person for this?