I only use brave at work because it somehow bypasses the firewall there and I can install and use it. I run it to watch videos about cooking or traveling and reading news when I have nothing to do at my job.

At home I usually run tor browser (tbb) and firefox with addons to block ads and tracking.

I’m not sure I should turn to brave as default browser. How do you see it?

what’s your experience with brave like?

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    The one founded by the guy who got fired from Mozilla for supporting hate groups?

    The one that integrates support for NFTs, the stupidest form of cryptocurrency scam?

    That browser?

    • ayaya@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Apparently you need to follow your own advice and do a search because it takes 30 seconds to see they are collecting data from their search engine not the browser. So if you don’t use their search (which is pretty shit anyway) it’s not relevant to the browser side of things. The browser is completely open source and everyone can see what the code is doing.

      And isn’t using search data to improve search results a pretty reasonable usecase for AI? Seems like a nothing burger. For the record I use librewolf but I find the constant Brave hate to be undeserved.

      • online@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        https://support.brave.com/hc/en-us/articles/4409406835469-What-is-the-Web-Discovery-Project-

        If you opt in, you’ll contribute some anonymous data about searches and web page visits made within the Brave Browser (including pages arrived at via some, but not all, other search engines). This data helps build the Brave Search independent index, and ensure we show results relevant to your search queries. By “data” we mean search queries, search result clicks, the URLs of pages visited in the browser, time spent on those pages, and some metadata about the pages themselves.

        My emphasis.

        • ayaya@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          So just don’t opt in then? They’re not selling the data, it’s completely optional, and they explain exactly what they’re collecting, how they’re collecting it, and what they’re using it for. This is all completely reasonable. They have to get this information for to improve the search somehow. Even the actual collection component is open source. I’m not sure what the issue is.

          • online@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            My reply was purely to get to the accurate information versus your reply which says that they are “collecting data from their search engine not the browser” as it’s important that people reading know what’s actually going on.

            I’m not here to argue about whether they should or should not do that and I’m not going to (and when I used Brave I consciously went into the menu to opt into this to improve their search engine so we could have a competitor).

      • binarybomb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ahh yeah I actually remember that now that you mention it, I used to be a heavy brave user since then I’ve moved to ARC, is pretty cool also built on top of chromium just like brave.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Used it for a while years ago, hated all the crypto stuff it tried to push but could still ignore most of it. Then saw the CEO sharing antivax propaganda and decided to try different options, ended up finding much browser options out there. These days I’m running Vivaldi. I think I would only put brave ahead of chrome itself now.

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s shady AF. Anything with that much crypto bs baked in shouldn’t be trusted.

    • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In OP’s case it sounds like the VPN service is the whole reason they’re using it. Not that I would recommend it, as their corporate IT likely has a policy against exactly this sort of thing

    • online@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just discovered this on a relative’s computer. Any trick to removing the VPN service?

    • AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The VPN services are installed but do not run unless/until you activate Brave VPN. This is such a non-issue.

  • m105@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    At work I use firefox, but to be fair we don’t have any firewall or restrictions. Home I use librewolf for privacy reasons.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    All evidence points to it being a very technically sound browser but with a terrible leadership. I used to use Brave but have since switched back to Vanadium.

  • Big P
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you so much as mention a browser on reddit you’ll get 5 replies telling you to try Brave

    • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Haven’t seen it mentioned once. Most of the time, it’s to NOT use brave as it’s sketchy, and to use Vivaldi, or even better Firefox.

  • ezjohnson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s a great browser. The mobile version is packed with features not found in other browsers and the desktop version is the best chromium based browser imho.

    A lot of people here trash talk brave because of the CEO but there are bad apples in every corporation.

  • NoiseColor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s a good browser. I used it for a really long time then switched to Firefox. Now I’m switching back, because Firefox has bizzare issues with rendering some pages and apps.

  • TheTeej107@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    As a regular user, it’s fine. I know the controversy around it. At the moment, it doesn’t bother me as much as it does with others. I only use brave, the browser. I don’t use its search or any other of their services.

    I would like to go to Firefox but only thing keeping me from switching is its PWA experience is not good compared to Brave/Chrome.

  • 𝚟➑𝚋𝚖𝚡³@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    For a browser that claims to be privacy focused, it’s not trustworthy (as indicated by the other commentors). I’ve ditched it myself some time ago

    • ayaya@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If you think the company isn’t trustworthy that’s completely understandable by why does that affect the browser? It’s fully open source. If they’re doing something shady with it people would instantly become aware of it.

      • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        We are aware of their involvement in crypto shit, and are therefore negative to them. Open source does not mean good (as in not evil), nor good (as in not bad).

        • ayaya@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You mean the crypto shit you can disable in a couple of clicks and completely ignore? Firefox doesn’t have that good of defaults either. You also have disable things like Pocket and change some settings to make it good. It’s why Hardened Firefox and Librewolf exist.

          And where did I say that open source = good? I just said it being open source makes it easily to see if they are doing something shady. It’s how they were caught changing the referral URLs a few years ago. If they try to pull anything they would be caught the same way they were before.

          • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            If they try to pull anything they would be caught the same way they were before.

            They were caught. My problem is that you think being caught deceiving your end users should go unpunished. Betraying your customers in that way should mean the end of the product.

            The fact that they do crypto shit is a general argument against them, that your arguments might counteract. The fact that they did SECRET crypto shit should be 100% nuclear.

            • ayaya@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              The fact that they did SECRET crypto shit should be 100% nuclear.

              It wasn’t a secret. By the nature of being open source, it is in the open. They literally can’t do anything secret which is what makes trusting the company a non-factor. You just have to trust that the community stays on top of things which is the same amount of trust required for any other open source project. Think about what happened with Audacity, they tried adding telemetry and was immediately called out for it.

              And nuclear? They added a variable in a URL. As far as I know it was only for Binance. It’s not like that’s a privacy concern because all that tells Binance is the user came from Brave… which they could already get from the user agent when you visit.

              And you know who else adds variables in URLs? Firefox. Type something in the address bar and hit enter (with default settings). You’ll see ?client=firefox-b-1-d in your Google search. Should they have added the referral code? Absolutely not. But it’s not that heinous.

              • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                makes trusting the company a non-factor
                You just have to trust that the community stays on top of things

                With your reasoning the latter point doesn’t matter, since you believe no action should be taken when the community discovers things.